Monthly Archives: May 2009

Gary Bettman and the truth are strangers.

At his State of the League address in Detroit on Saturday, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman made a very big issue out of the fact he saved the Pittsburgh Penguins and planned to save the Phoenix Coyotes.

As all hockey fans know, the Penguins required bankruptcy protection (for a second time in franchise history) a decade ago but because the team eventually drafted Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin (after the Penguins once again faced financial difficulties in 2002) and because Mario Lemieux jumped into the ownership game (to make sure he was paid the $33 million he was owed), Pittsburgh was able to overcome its financial mess ($37.5 million in losses in 1998 and 1999) and remain a viable NHL member.

“Truth be told, it’s probably fair to say that the Pittsburgh Penguins – during their bankruptcy period – were in worse shape,” Bettman said on Saturday afternoon. “Because they didn’t even have at the time the prospect of a new building. And look at where they are today. …

“We didn’t walk out on Pittsburgh, we fought to fix their problems. We’re fighting for Phoenix because of our covenant with the team and the fans there.”

Yeah, just like he didn’t walk out on Winnipeg when he refused to even discuss the concept of a community-owned franchise (which he later allowed in Edmonton), publicly declared that there had to be one single owner approved by the NHL governors and then did everything in his power to move the team out of Winnipeg to any other stinking building in any other non-hockey community he could find.

Most journalists today like to write (for brevity’s sake, one suspects) that the Jets were simply moved to Phoenix in 1996, but that isn’t entirely true. The purchasers of the Jets, Dr. Richard Burke and Steven Gluckstern, wanted to move the team to  Minneapolis, but when they couldn’t cut a deal with the Target Centre, Bettman “arranged” to have the team move into Jerry Colangelo’s basketball building in downtown Phoenix, the one with the obstructed views at one end.

When Bettman says: “We didn’t walk out on Pittsburgh, we fought to fix their problems. We’re fighting for Phoenix because of our covenant with the team and the fans there,” he’s handing the journalists in attendance a lie and expecting those journalists to believe him without a challenge. Sadly, they did.

Gary Bettman did nothing for Winnipeg fans — or Quebec fans when the Nordiques moved to Colorado. He had no covenant in either of those markets. He likes to pick and choose his “covenants.” 

On Saturday, Gary Bettman and the truth were strangers.

Lots of Hockey News At Stanley Cup Time: Steen Back in Hockey, Hnidy Wants to Re-Sign in Boston, Wings Win Game 1.

Three things that came up during telephone conversations this past week…

1) Our good friend, Thomas Steen got a job in hockey.

That’s just not good news, it’s great news.

Thomas has gone through some tough times in the past few years, but now he’s back in the game.

The one-time Winnipeg Jets captain and all-time Winnipeg Jets legend is going back to Sweden to work in both junior hockey and the Swedish Elite League.

“I’m going to work for Modo,” Thomas told us. “I’m going to be an assistant coach with the pro club and an assistant coach and scout with the junior team.

“I’m leaving the first of July and I’ll be gone nine months. I’ll get back to Winnipeg for my golf tournament in August, at Christmas and during the Olympic break. But that’s it. I’m going back home.”

He’s not quite going home. Farjestad is home. But close enough.

2) Another good friend, Neepawa’s Shane Hnidy, can become a free-agent on July 1 but what Shane would really like to do is re-sign with the Boston Bruins.

“Yeah, I’d really like to come back here,” he said. “I thought we were good enough to win it all this year, but I know we’ll be good enough to win it next year.”

Hnidy, 34, one of the great stories of heart and perseverance in the NHL, has been a pro for 13 seasons. He’s played nine of those years in the NHL with Ottawa, Nashville, Atlanta, Anaheim and Boston after being drafted (173rd overall) by Buffalo in 1994.

“Someday, I’d like to be a hockey commentator on TV or radio,” Hnidy said. “But right now, I still want to play and I hope that next year, I’m playing in Boston.”

3) We had Darren Helm’s mom, Karine, on 92-CITI-FM’s morning show this past week, the morning after he scored the OT winner against the Blackhawks. She was very proud, and one sensed, still crying after her son’s heroics on Wednesday.

That night, Helm set an NHL record with his fifth career playoff goal. He now has five playoff goals and has yet to score a single regular-season goal. No other NHL player has ever done that.

However, besides scoring goals, the young man from St. Andrews, Man., has one other talent: He can win faceoffs.

In the opener of the Stanley Cup final, a game won 3-1 by Detroit, Helm had won 10-of-12 faceoffs in the first two periods. He finsihed with 11 wins in 15 faceoffs.

One suspects Helm will be a full-time member of the Red Wings next season. It’s unlikely he’ll ever see Grand Rapids, Mich., again.

By the way, how good was Chris Osgood on Saturday night? First star? 29 saves? The best goalie in the playoffs, two years in a row.

Helm gets Red Wings to within Four Games of Back-to-Back Stanley Cup Crowns.

Thanks to a kid from tiny St. Andrews, Man., the Detroit Red Wings have advanced to the Stanley Cup final to face the Pittsburgh Penguins for the second straight year.

Wednesday night in Detroit, the Wings ended the Cinderella playoff run of the young Chicago Blackhawks with a 2-1 overtime victory as Darren Helm was the hero. Helm scored the game winner at 3:58 of overtime as the Western Conference champs are now just four wins away from their second straight Stanley Cup. The final starts Saturday night in Detroit.

Amazingly, Helm became the first player in history to score his first five NHL goals in the playoffs. He still hasn’t scored a regular-season goal. He breaks the record of another Manitoban, Winnipegger Eddie (Spider) Mazur who scored his first four NHL goals in the playoffs with the Montreal Canadiens in the 1950s.

Here’s our look at the upcoming Stanley Cup final:

Western Conference champion Detroit Red Wings (No. 2 seed in the West) vs. Eastern Conference champion Pittsburgh Penguins (No. 4 seed in the East):

The Red Wings are clearly the favourites, and for good reason. They just won the Western Conference title without Hart Trophy (MVP) finalist Pavel Datsyuk and Norris Trophy finalist (Top Defenceman) Nicklas Lidstrom is the lineup for the final two games of the Western Conference final.

However, when the Wings beat the Penguins in five games in last year’s final, the Pens’ top scorer Evgeni Malkin was injured and now, with a healthy Malkin, the Pens disposed of the Carolina Hurricanes in the Eastern final in four straight games. Meanwhile, Malkin was not only the leading scorer in the regular season this year, but is currently tied with teammate Sidney Crosby for the scoring lead in the playoffs.

But here is why I like the Wings to repeat: Youth, experience and speed. Granted, with the addition of Bill Guerin, the Penguins have those elements, but Detroit just might have one of the great teams in NHL history. Almost every member of the Wings already has a Stanley Cup ring with two exceptions: off-season acquisitions Marian Hossa and Ty Conklin, who both played in Pittsburgh last year. I also like Detroit’s goaltending. Chris Osgood will outplay Marc-Andre Fleury when it counts.

The Wings and Pens split the season series 1-1. Detroit won 3-0 in Pittsburgh on NBC, on Feb. 8 while Pittsburgh won 7-6 in overtime way back on Nov. 11 in Detroit as Jordan Staal had a hat-trick. No team has repeated as Stanley Cup champions since, you guessed it, the Red Wings in 1997 and 1998. And that’s why I like the Red Wings in six games.

Old coaches, young superstars and the best goalie in the playoffs.

As we get set to watch the Pittsburgh Penguins eliminate the Carolina Hurricanes in four straight games (barring a miracle), in tonight’s Eastern Conference final there was a boatload of hockey news today.

There was also just some stuff.

Onward:

1) Pat Quinn was hired as head coach by the Edmonton Oilers today. He’s 66. Personally, I like Pat Quinn, a lot. He’s a fine man, who did a wonderful job with Team Canada in Salt Lake City in 2002 and with our national junior team. I had a lot of respect for him when he was head coach of the Leafs and I must admit, he’s always been very respectful to me.

The question has to be in this case: Can a 66-year-old coach find happiness with a young team in Edmonton? Especially after the Calgary Flames just dumped 59-year-old Mike Keenan, another old coach, who gets recycled more than old truck tires. 

There is a difference, however. Keenan is a guy who likes “his guys.” He likes veteran players he knows and can trust. And that’s fine. Trouble is, “his guys” don’t win anymore. Quinn, however, during his time with the national junior team, proved to everyone he can teach young players how to play the game.

And that’s exactly what the Oilers need.

Age has nothing to do with anything. It’s attitude and approach that matters. Quinn might be 66, but he has already demonstrated that he respects young, enthusiastic hockey players and can take those types of players and show them how to win.

Full disclosure: I like Pat Quinn as a person. And I also believe he will be a great head coach in Edmonton.

2) Tonight, we get to watch the likes of Sidney Crosby, Eric Staal, Evgeni Malkin and Cam Ward play an extremely important NHL playoff game.

If the Penguins win, the young stars from Pittsburgh will zoom into the Stanley Cup final for a second straight year (frankly, no matter what the Hurricanes do, Pittsburgh’s offence should put a quick nail in Carolina’s coffin).

What is most interesting, however, is that whenever the media looks for a storyline involving the Pens, it’s always Sidney Crosby vs. (insert name here). Sidney Crosby vs. Alexander Ovechkin. Sidney Crosby vs. Jarome Iginla. Sidney Crosby vs. oh, I don’t know, Johan Franzen?

Unfortunately, the mainstream hockey media loves a story no matter how silly it is. If anyone is looking for a consistent storyline, it should be this one: Evgeni Malkin vs. the hockey world.

This spring, Ovechkin will likely be awarded the Hart Trophy as the regular season MVP and so far in the playoffs, Crosby has the inside track to the Conn Smythe Trophy. 

Meanwhile, all Malkin has done is win the league scoring championship and lead all scorers in the playoffs (12 goals and 16 assists). 

There was a day before all these mouth-breathing TV bingo callers became uber-experts, a day when scoring goals and dishing out assists was an important part of the game. And today, nobody does that better than Evgeni Malkin.

I guess he’s no Sidney Crosby (he certainly doesn’t have the same group of publicists), but he could be the Rodney Dangerfield of the NHL.

3) Of course, if Malkin isn’t hockey’s answer to Rodney D., it’s Detroit Red Wings goaltender Chris Osgood.

Ozzie is close to winning his third Stanley Cup as a starter (he was also on a winner as the No. 2 to Mike Vernon). He’s also been to the finals one other time, been a Vezina Trophy runner-up and won the Jennings Trophy twice. He was the second goalie ever to score a goal (following Ron Hextall), was the No. 1 goalie (statistically) in the NHL in the 1995-96 season, is 10th in the NHL in career wins and the winningest goaltender in Red Wings history. He’s been an all-star, won Stanley Cups in two decades and is on the verge of going back-to-back.

And yet, you ask anybody in the mainstream media and he/she will tell you: “Detroit’s only problem is goaltending.”

Hogwash.

I can’t tell you how sick I am of hearing our TV experts talk of Tim Thomas this or Roberto Luongo that or Cam Ward… whatever. The best goalie in the playoffs last year was Chris Osgood and clearly the best goalie this year is Chris Osgood.

At 37, he’s never been better. Right now he leads the playoffs in wins with 11, is second in goals against average at 2.14 and fourth in save percentage at .921. He’s 11-4 in the post-season, has an assist and a shutout.

He’s often hung out to dry by his always-attacking teammates and yet he’s made some magnificent saves in this year’s post-season. He’s been tremendous.

At this stage, I don’t want to argue with the experts who believe Crosby is a shoo-in to take the Conn Smythe. But there is still a lot of hockey left.

And right now, the best goalie in the playoffs has not been Jonas Hiller, Cam Ward or Tim Thomas. It’s been Chris Osgood.

How about a real discussion about the return of the NHL to Winnipeg?

Winnipeg deserves a National Hockey League franchise. It’s a great hockey city in a great hockey nation and for that reason alone, Winnipeg should be part of the NHL.

But Winnipeg needs two things. Winnipeg needs an owner (or group of owners) who are prepared to lose money every year in an arena that seats 15,015. And it needs an intelligent debate using REAL numbers and brutal honesty to determine if indeed, this city, can be part of a league that requires anywhere from $80 million to $100 million a year in revenues to operate.

However, once again the debate has been clouded by silly political rhetoric and numbers that have apparently come out of the fantasmagorical typewriters of Forbes Magazine. That’s the fishwrap that claims the “average” NHL team is worth $220 million. And in what alternate universe is that reality?

So in Saturday’s Winnipeg Free Press, Randy Turner and Mia Rabson wrote a couple of lengthy  pieces on the possibility of the NHL’s return to Winnipeg. Some of it was fine. Most of it used faulty numbers and anecdotal mythology.

For example:

Turner wrote: “Even in the midst of a continent wide recession, Winnipeg has remained relatively untouched by job losses or a plunge in the housing market. Indeed, while many North American cities — whether they belong to the NHL club or not — experience varying levels of economic distress, this city continues its usual and historical modest growth. All things considered, we’re doing fine, thank-you.”

Where do I start???

1. Housing prices in Winnipeg are off anywhere from 8-17 per cent. The value of my house is down 13 per cent since 2007. Guess Randy doesn’t own a house.

2. Untouched by job losses? What the …? The Winnipeg Free Press has laid off or bought out 28 people in 2009. There are hints of more cuts to come. Randy TURNER might be working, but a fine journalist named James TURNER is not. Evidently Randy hasn’t missed the people who have been run out of his building. Granted, to be fair, minimum-wage, no-benefit, part-time jobs in food service are still growing.

3. Modest growth??? Guess he missed the May 6 report at http://www.fpnewspapers.com. In the first quarter of 2008, the FP Income Fund made a profit of $2.3 million. In the first quarter of 2009, after all those job cuts, FP reported a loss of $500,000. That’s a drop of $2.8 million in a year. Last week, Publisher Bob Cox was quoted in his own newspaper as saying that there was no improvement in April. And that’s just one company. 

I’m in the middle of the advertising and marketing business in this province every single day and I can tell you, the FP isn’t the only business struggling. Did Turner miss “Black Wednesday” in the auto business? Park Pontiac didn’t miss it. Nor did Birchwood Pontiac. Walk into any business in Winnipeg — the international home of the Dollar Store — and ask the boss how it’s going. Nine out of 10 will tell you “It’s lousy. Business is lousy.”

I could go on, but why pick at nits?

The rest of this three page effort suggests only one thing: The NHL is a lost cause in a small building. If the Phoenix Coyotes averaged 14,875 per game in 2008-09 (Mia Rabson, page A10) and those are reportable numbers to the NHLPA so that the Coyotes can be involved in the revenue sharing plan, and the Coyotes have filed court documents this past week suggesting they could lose $50 million in 2008-09 with a “floor” payroll of $40 million, what would happen in Winnipeg if the team averaged 15,015 (a full house in the MTS Centre) per game? A $40 million loss? Would Mark Chipman pay for that kind of loss out of his own pocket or would he use the profits from the MTS Centre’s successful concert program to pay the debts on the hockey team? The Chipman family is way too smart for that.

Sadly, in all of this newspaper space, two earnest journalistic attempts failed to discuss the corporate advertising and promotional support required by the NHL in a city that has few if any head offices and only one or two local businesses that would even consider the multi-million dollar ad and promo packages that drive NHL teams. Remember, if an NHL team comes back to Winnipeg, almost every promotional and advertising penny in the community will have to be directed toward it. If an NHL team comes back, the Bombers might not survive the corporate hit. It could be time to re-consider the football stadium.

Does anyone have access to the real numbers? Does anyone know what real ticket prices must be? Has anyone ever written a piece indicating that there is a lot more to running a professional sports franchise than simply regurgitating the player payroll? How ’bout discussing the costs of turning on the lights in the building? We all know hydro is making money. How ’bout cell phones for employees? Hotels and per diems on the road? Buses and airplane tickets and equipment and daily building employee costs?  To suggest, even slightly, that a return of the NHL to Winnipeg, under the current CBA, is financially feasible, makes absolutely no economic sense at all unless you have an owner ready to pick up substantial losses — not Coyotes losses, but substantial nonetheless. 

Oh yeah, and about the $180 million (bottom end) or so it will cost to purchase an existing team and move it to Winnipeg? Even if the team broke even, it’s unlikely the Chipmans — or whomever — would ever see that money again.

The return of the Jets to Winnipeg must be discussed, but it must be discussed without emotion. It must be discussed with an eye to finding an owner who is so philanthropic that having a hockey team in Winnipeg is more important than making money.

Winnipeg deserves an NHL team, but it doesn’t deserve to have a team re-located here only to have an owner realize three or four years later that while Winnipeg is a hockey town, it’s also a frugal town that loves a winner.

And if a team were brought here for a second time and then sold to another city for a second time, what would that do to a city’s self-worth?

There Is a Reason to Believe That the NHL Could Indeed Return to Winnipeg

There are some people in Winnipeg who believe the money is already here. There are others who aren’t so sure, but certainly agree that the money could be found.

Right now, Winnipeg doesn’t have a sugar daddy like Jim Balsillie, running around trying to buy it a National Hockey League franchise, but after a few discussions with some of the city’s more prominent business and political leaders today, one thing is certain: Winnipeg’s attitude and approach to the NHL has changed dramatically from the day in 1996 when the team was shut down and shipped off to the Arizona desert.

The people at the top of the NHL mountain in this town, the people who own True North Sports and Entertainment, don’t want to talk about the NHL. And that’s a good thing. That’s exactly what the NHL wants: Silence, respect, patience. “Keep your mouth shut Winnipeg, don’t make any demands, let us get our house in order and you will, one day, be rewarded.” The Chipman family knows that the less said the better.

Meanwhile, progressive Winnipeggers who are tired of living through icy cold winters alone on the prairie, are looking to our political leaders to at least make an effort to bring the Jets — or a reasonable facsimile — back to town. 

One senses there is political will at every level to make it happen. Mayor Sam Katz worries that another disappointment might be too much for some people in this town, but he’s made it clear he’ll do what he can to bring the NHL back to the city. Premier Gary Doer has met with the Chipmans and is confident everything is moving in the right direction.

What we have in this town, at this time, is an agreement in the business and political communities that the NHL’s return to Winnipeg is feasible. It’s not an empty net goal, but the leaders are at least grinding in the corners with the right attitude.

Whether the money is already here or whether the leaders have to get the cash together is not the major concern. The major concern is will and there would appear to be plenty of will.

If the people in Winnipeg with political influence and financial wherewithal can come together — and they appear to be getting closer together — then the Jets will return. 

There are a lot of reasons why the Jets might fail a second time. But there are also more compelling reasons to give it a shot. Unlike our leaders in the 1980s and 1990s, the people running the city today, believe that the NHL is an important step in our future as an inviting, intelligent, vibrant, international community. 

It’s a credit to all of them that these people believe there is something better out there, something that will make Winnipeg a better place to live. There is no reason to believe, at this stage, that the return of the Jets is an impossible pipe dream.

It’s not only possible now, it could very well be probable.

Fraud and Lies Beget Fraud and Lies

Fraud and lies. That’s the NHL way. And it just never stops.

Every hockey fan with a brain bigger than a walnut knows that lying is a way of life in the NHL, but commissioner Gary Bettman, a man the Winnipeg Sun called a “rat-weasel” in a headline on Sunday, would sure like everyone to think differently.

According to a court filing from Jerry Moyes, the man on the hook for the monstrous debts of the Phoenix Coyotes, the people for whom he ran the Phoenix franchise seem to lie for fun: “The National Hockey League acted fraudulently in its bid to take control of the Phoenix Coyotes,” Moyes claimed this past week. “And the NHL’s current position proves the fraudulent inducement claim.”

Funny how the word fraud always comes up in any court filing involving Bettman’s NHL.

In fact, we pointed out earlier here at rivercitysportsblog.com that at least six of the NHL’s most prominent owners were convicted (or are in court facing charges) of fraud. To review:

1) When he took over as commissioner, one of his closest friends and supporters inside the league was Los Angeles Kings owner Bruce McNall. McNall went to jail for fraud.

2) Former Islanders owner John Spano was sentenced in January of 2000 to 71 months in federal prison for bank fraud.

3) Later in the Isles ownership history, long after former Coyotes owner Steven Gluckstern nearly went broke owning the franchise, Bettman brought in Charles Wang and Sanjay Kumar. Kumar is now serving a 12-year sentence for a multi-billion dollar fraud. 

4) Bettman also needed help after Buffalo Sabres owner Seymour Knox died in 1996, so he found cable TV magnate John Rigas. In 2002, while he was the Sabres owner, Rigas was convicted of, you guessed it, fraud. He’s still in prison.

5) Then came former Anaheim Ducks owner Henry Samueli. He’s a big time crook who, among other things, lied to the SEC about his role in a $2.2 billion stock-option scam. He’s currently doing his time. 

6) Then there was “Bootsie.” With the Nashville Predators in bankruptcy protection, Bettman refused to sell the team to Balsillie because Balsillie wanted to move it to Canada. So Bettman went out and found a wealthy venture capitalist named William (Bootsie) Del Biaggio III. It seemed like a good idea at the time, I guess, but it wasn’t long before Bootsie was facing fraud charges brought on by everybody from the SEC to Luc Robitaille to Joe Montana. Bootsie hasn’t gone to jail yet, but there are a lot of people who would like to see him in the crow bar hotel. Today, he faces a six year term. 

Meanwhile, Bettman’s pals have been saying Balsillie is “very brash” and “doesn’t want to play by the rules.” What rules? There are no rules. And if there are, Bettman will change them as he goes.

Don’t believe me? There are plenty of examples, including this current one:

Bettman claims Moyes handed over control of the Coyotes to the NHL last November in return for financing, and that a team of league officials has been running day to day operations ever since. However, just as Bettman himself claimed for six months, Moyes has now filed an affidavit saying that the league never had control of the team and “did not want control.”

Moyes added: “By taking a different position now, the league is trying to fraudulently take the Phoenix Coyotes franchise away from me.”

Moyes has argued from the start of this proceeding that NHL officials have made it clear since Day 1 that after the financing was arranged, in November of 2008, the league “did not plan to operate the club and that the arrangment didn’t change anything in terms of how the club was run.”

According to documents filed in court: “The league did not have day to day control, but merely received weekly financial updates.”

Meanwhile, Bettman lies with such ease, you’d think he was Dick Cheney.

On his Sirius XM Radio show, Bettman said, “Ripping a franchise out of one city in violation of League rules and procedures to put it somewhere else isn’t the way we do business. and comparisons to Quebec and Winnipeg aren’t valid, because we couldn’t find anybody who wanted to own the teams there.”

I don’t know about Quebec, but as it pertains to Winnipeg, that is an outright lie.

Winnipeg had an ownership group in place, but Bettman looked me right in the eye and claimed that group ownership was not permitted in the NHL. He wanted one owner, period. No groups.

Then, after he ripped the Jets out of Winnipeg and shipped them to Phoenix for the 13-year disaster, he allowed an ownership group in Edmonton. 

The truth and Gary Bettman are strangers.

Bettman Uses Winnipeg as a Pawn in His Nasty Fight With Balsillie.

You knew the word “Winnipeg” had to turn up at some point.

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman, in his ugly court battle with RIM CEO Jim Balsillie, a wealthy entrepreneur who wants to move the Phoenix Coyotes to Hamilton, filed an affidavit with the court in Phoenix suggesting the NHL would rather have a American-based team move to Winnipeg than Southern Ontario.

The news arrived in Canada on TSN yesterday and not long after I received a telephone call from Winnipeg mayor, Sam Katz.

“What do you think of Mr. Bettman’s proclamation?” the Mayor asked.

“I think it’s disingenuous,” I replied. “I think Bettman will use anything he can to win the war with Balsillie and make himself look good. I think he’s said something to make it seem like he cares about the NHL in Canada, but he doesn’t, and he’s just being the same guy who lied about ‘not being in control of the Coyotes’ for six months when he actually was in control.” 

Mayor Sam didn’t seem happy.

“All this is going to do is cause more grief and unnecessary heartache,” Katz said. “I think it would be great to have a team back, but we don’t have anyone with deep enough pockets to buy the team and then operate it in Winnipeg. And until we find an owner, there is no sense talking about it.”

The mayor, as usual, is absolutely right. We did have someone who was rich enough and smart enough to own a team, but Izzy Asper has passed on and that leaves no one.

Although some people would love to call the MTS Centre, “NHL-suitable,” it’s too small, the seats are too uncomfortable for the prices that would have to be charged, the press box is too small, there aren’t enough suites, parking revenues are a problem and no one is sure about the value (if any) of television revenue or corporate support. The fans are there, nobody doubts that, but what price will they pay to sit in an undersized arena is anyone’s guess.

An NHL team in Winnipeg would lose money, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. That’s because it’s very unlikely a team in Winnipeg would lose as much money as the teams are already losing in Florida, Atlanta, Tampa, Nashville, Long Island and Phoenix.

The return of the NHL to Winnipeg would be the right move by the NHL, but we all know the NHL isn’t full of “right moves” (What the hell IS Versus and why is there a team in Fort Lauderdale?). 

In the meantime, it’s pretty unfair to use this community as a pawn in an ongoing battle with an honest, well-meaning billionaire who wants to put a team in Hamilton.

On to the Conference finals: We like Wings and Pens — Again — in the Stanley Cup final

For those of us trying to make money in the wonderful world of Sport Select, the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs have been a pretty decent source of revenue. 

Granted, after two rounds, the two top seeds — the Boston Bruins in the East and the San Jose harks in the West — are gone, but for the most part, the teams we have selected to reach the Conference Finals, have indeed reached the Conference finals.

Pittsburgh, with Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin will face Carolina with Eric Staal (our darkhorse pick as a Stanley Cup finalist) in the Eastern final, while the “Winnipeg” teams, Chicago with captain Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith and Cam Barker against Detroit, with Darren Helm and Derek Meech, are in the Western final.

That’s obviously the way it should be.

For the record, here at rcsportsblog.com (you can follow us on twitter), we went 7-1 in the first round and 3-1 in Round 2. The only outcome we did not select correctly in Round 1 was, of course, Anaheim’s upset of Jonathan Cheechoo’s San Jose Sharks and our only incorrect choice in Round 2 was Carolina’s Game 7 upset of the No. 1-ranked Boston Bruins.

Interestingly, we also said that the two most interesting — and exciting — series would be Chicago-Vancouver and Pittsburgh-Washington. They were.

So on with the Show. Here’s our look at the third round, the conference finals, of the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs.

ROUND THREE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

No. 4 Pittsburgh Penguins vs. No. 6 Carolina Hurricanes

The Pens won the season series 2-1-1 and were not only in last year’s Stanley Cup final, but have five players with Stanley Cup rings. They obviously have enough experience to handle this series against a team that won the Cup in 2006 and still have 10 players from that team. The Pens have the stars in Crosby, Malkin, Gonchar and Jordan Staal, but Carolina has so much grit and character, that it’s impossible to count them out. It also doesn’t hurt that when it looked like this team was out of it back in February, goalie Cam Ward went 14-4-2 over the final 20 games. Ward won the Conn Smythe Trophy in 2006 and will have to be that good again against all the Pittsburgh firepower. We like the Penguins in five.

WESTERN CONFERENCE

No. 2 Detroit Red Wings vs. No. 4 Chicago Blackhawks

The Red Wings are the defending Stanley Cup champions and they’re certainly good enough to win it again. In fact, the Red Wings have the best team in the National Hockey League. They roll four strong lines, have a Norris Trophy defenceman in Nick Lidstrom and an MVP-calibre forward in Pavel Datsyuk, they are well-coached and have better goaltending (Chris Osgood) than the Eastern media will ever give credit. The Wings won the season series against the upstart Hawks, but when asked about this matchup, I always see that January 1, outdoor game at Wrigley Field, the one in which the Hawks rode the home crowd to an early lead and then collapsed under the weight of the Wings speed and talent. The most important thing the Hawks have going for them is youth and enthusiasm and, hey, that might carry them, but we like Detroit in six.

Three things rattling around in my brain…

I have a few more things rattling around in my cranium other than this, but after crunchy peanut butter and last night’s Power Ball numbers, these are the only things that would likely matter to anyone else…

1) NHL commissioner Gary Bettman gets more hypocritical every day. He says he wants to do whatever he can for his owners, but when one gets in serious trouble — like Jerry Moyes in Phoenix — Bettman throws him under the bus.

Here is the latest response by Jim Balsillie to a court filing by the National Hockey League:

HAMILTON, ON, May 14 /CNW/ – Jim Balsillie today issued the following statement with regard to NHL motions filed in a Phoenix bankruptcy court: 

   … “I can tell you this. I made a generous good faith offer to buy the Coyotes from Jerry Moyes, who I understand is the owner of the Coyotes. Who owns or controls the team is a distinction without a difference. The team itself is still bankrupt, voluntarily or not. The owner of the team has a fiduciary obligation towards the creditors.

       “My offer, which goes the furthest in satisfying creditors’ claims, is still the same. It’s $212 million to buy the Coyotes and bring them to the best un-served hockey market in the world in Southern Ontario. We look forward to discussing this no matter what the outcome on May 19th.

    “At the end of the day, this is about the passion Canadians feel for the game of hockey and a chance to provide those fans with the opportunity to support a seventh NHL team. That’s what this is all about, great hockey fans in a great hockey market.”

Sadly, Gary Bettman wouldn’t know a good hockey market or a good hockey fan if one tripped and fell over his throat.

Why Bettman hates Canada and, for the most part, hates the game of hockey, is a mystery.

2) Remember Jean-Sebastien Giguere? In case you don’t, he led the Anaheim Ducks to the Stanley Cup in 2007.

Giguere is still in Anaheim, but he doesn’t play much anymore. the hero in Anaheim is now Jonas Hiller, a guy who already has three rings — for the championship of the Swiss League, in 2002, 2005 and 2007. He’s also won two Spengler Cups with Davos.

Of course, if the Ducks win Game 7 against Detroit tonight, he just could win another ring this year. Along with a Conn Smythe Trophy as the playoff MVP.

Or, he could lose and join Roberto Luongo and Simeon Varlamov in 2009 post-season infamy.

It should be a great game tonight. 

3) Finally, in the CFL, the league announced four rule changes that were suggested by the fans in an online poll:

          a) The league’s board of governors approved moving the kickoff back 10 yards to the 25-yard line following a safety.

          b) Allowing coaches to use “wildcat” formations that would move the quarterback around, instead of requiring him to stand behind or under centre.

          c) Requiring a team that makes a field goal to kick off rather than give the receiving the team the option of taking the ball at its 35-yard-line.

         d) Giving a team a third instant replay challenge if its first two are successful.

I have no problem with any of those rules changes. I guess I’m just like a lot of fans. I didn’t think the quarterback was stuck behind centre anyway, didn’t care if a team kicked from the 35 or 25 after a safety and didn’t realize that taking the ball at the 35 or kicking off mattered that much.

My rule change remains the same: If a CFL team uses a Canadian (non-import) as its No. 3 quarterback, it can use an extra import in the starting line-up. At some point, we must — in our own league — make it worth the coaches’ while to develop Canadian  quarterbacks, just like they develop U.S. college rookies.