April 12, 2008

I took my time to write this: Referees drive me nuts - Game 2: Minnesota 3 Colorado 2 (OT)

Views and comments expressed in posts do not necessarily reflect the views
of River City Sports.

As a broken-down old newspaper columnist, I must admit that I find myself worshipping at the altar of the blog.

In the newspaper dodge, if you’re covering an event, you often find yourself on deadline, rushing to get the news out the other end of your laptop so the editor can butcher it and get it into print eight hours later.

Everyone has read copy from an otherwise terrific reporter that appears senseless and garbled because it arrived on deadline and the copy editors were either too stressed, too stupid or too lazy to make sense of it. That’s when reporters get their e-mail inboxes clogged with missives from readers that say, "Were you even at that game, you f*$*%#&g moron?!?"

It’s embarrassing and avoidable, but those of us who have been in the business understand that editors are like sports referees: they have authority and power, but sometimes you just can’t understand how they got their jobs.

And that’s why I waited 10 hours to write this post. I wanted to tap into the luxury of the blog. Nobody said I had to file it right after the game so as I watched the conclusion of Game 2 of the Minnesota-Colorado series on Friday night, I wanted to watch all the replays, listen to all the commentary and then, do it all over again in the morning.

My concern centered around two plays. A late penalty to Minnesota’s  Kim Johnsson with less two minutes remaining and the winning goal by Keith Carney - or allegedly, the winning goal by Keith Carney.

The Wild were leading 2-1, when the official (who shall remain nameless), called a hooking penalty on Johnsson. It was obviously not hooking by any definition, and thankfully, eagle-eyed commentator Darren Pang, on the TSN desk, made it clear that the offended, Ryan Smyth of the Avs, actually fell over the goal stick of Minnesota netminder Niklas Backstrom. It was, in fact, a dreadful call, left the Wild with four skaters to Colorado’s six and eventually resulted in Milan Hejduk’s tying goal.

The most annoying thing about any sporting event is when a bad call has an affect on the outcome. It makes the game look scripted. It’s an embarrassment.

In this case, it appeared to happen a second time, only on this occasion, to the benefit of the Wild.

In every replay I saw, Keith Carney’s slapshot that went past Jose Theodore, deflected off the skate of Brian Rolston, not off the skate of Colorado defenceman Ruslan Salei. In fact, commentator Pierre McGuire believed it might have been re-directed by Rolston and shouldn’t have counted. It looked pretty shaky, but in this case, the official went upstairs, got the green light from the video booth and the goal stood.

Perhaps it was the hockey gods. Perhaps they knew the penalty to Johnsson was just a horrible call at a very bad time in what was otherwise, a great hockey game. Perhaps someone or something divine just decided to even things up.

Whatever. On this night, the better team won - although that’s not to say the Wild are the "best" team in the series - and every one in St. Paul went home happy.

But sadly, a bad call at an odd time, made a great game look phoney. We all make mistakes, but sometimes you just have to wonder.

By the way, in four years at the National Post, I’ve had one angry e-mail — from a St. Mary’s University football fan who didn’t think the Vanier Cup champion University of Manitoba Bisons were as good as I’d suggested. Those are "good" angry e-mails.

I guess, to no one’s surprise, I’m now working with the best referees in the newspaper game.

And, to be fair, by the time we get to the Conference finals, we’ll be watching the best referees in hockey.

Frankly, I just feel better this morning. I feel better that I didn’t sit down at my computer last night, seconds after that awful call on Johnsson, and started to rant like a lunatic. It’s the beauty of the blog. You have time to sit back and take a measured look.

Although I’ve been noticing that a lot of us don’t.

Minnesota vs Colorado Game 2 highlights below - including that goal.

 

Views and comments expressed in posts do not necessarily reflect the views
of River City Sports.

Filed under 2008 NHL Playoffs, Blog by

Permalink Print

Comments on I took my time to write this: Referees drive me nuts - Game 2: Minnesota 3 Colorado 2 (OT)

April 13, 2008

Schooly @ 7:55 am

I think the instantaneous nature of blogs is what makes them more real than mainstream media. Sure, you could have gone off half-cocked about the reffing in that game (and you would have been justified in doing so!) In waiting to post, which is, after all, probably the more sensible thing to do, you let your internal editor make changes to what you were going to say. I'm not saying that MSM is bad- but you do have that copy editor or deadline hanging over your head always. With blogs, you get the real at-the-moment feeling. And you get the real personality of the writer coming through, with all the emotion and feeling and style, warts and all. And I think that's pretty cool. And while on the subject of referees: as a lifelong Philadelphia Flyers fan, what the hell was the ref thinking when he didn't blow play dead when Thoresen got hit in the groin? It was pretty obvious it was serious. And it led to a goal which changed the tide of the game.

JC @ 12:16 pm

Even if you did "rant like a lunatic" if would have been acceptable. Us Wild fans have been ranting like lunatics at the terrible state of referee'ing in the NHL these days. Maybe there's too many games, maybe they're stretched too thin, maybe for some reason they just hate the Wild, I don't know, and I'm not going to speculate. We've been the victims of some AWFUL calls.

The Johnsson call made us at our game party say some terrible things about the ref, only some of which I take back… but c'mon, first off, it wasn't a penalty, second, you don't make "close" calls like that with a minute or so left in the game, you just don't give the team a 6-4 advantage like that unless something terribly egregious happens, last I checked, that's how things work, maybe I'm wrong…but probably not.

And for the record, according to my HD feed (we zoomed, we slo-mo'd…), the puck went off Salei's boot… not Rolston's… heck, if it went off Rolston's skate, would Colorado really have been that quick to leave the ice? Anyway, that's a debate that's already been ended by Toronto ;)

All told, can't wait for game 3!

Register Login
Views and comments expressed in posts do not necessarily reflect the views River City Sports
Copyright 2008 River City Sports - Your premier source for hockey jerseys and sports merchandise!