Tag Archives: Anaheim Ducks

This Should be Barry Trotz’s Year

Now that he has been nominated — again — for the Jack Adams Award as the NHL’s coach of the Year, maybe this is it.

After all, year-in and year-out, there is no better coach in the National Hockey League than Dauphin, Manitoba’s gift to the NHL, Nashville Predators bench boss, Barry Trotz.

For the sake of full disclosure, I am the president of the Barry Trotz fan club. I have, without apology, been campaigning for Trotz since the early 2000s. There is no better coach in the game.

And already this spring, he has proven it. First with a six-game victory over the Anaheim Ducks and now with  a Round 2 Game 1 victory over the Vancouver Canucks IN Vancouver.

“I’m happy because I think of the resiliency of the group that worked so hard all year, and I’m relieved because there is a little bit of a cloud that we wanted to get to the next level,”  Trotz told reporters after his Preds dispatched Anaheim. ”And if we never got there in this series, I think there would be a little bit of a carry-over.”

“We got help from everybody. Everybody contributed. That’s sort of what we do. That’s our DNA. To win this series, we needed everybody and everybody contributed.”

Certainly the country’s hockey mavens  know the players who toil for Trotz. However, for the average hockey fan, the Preds are one of the game’s greatest collection of no-names. Nick Spaling, Marcel Goc, Matt Halischuk, Cal O’Reilly, Joel Ward, Colin Wilson, Kevin Klein (he’s an actor, isn’t he?), Shane O’Brien, Cody Franson, none of those guys conjures up thoughts of Sidney Crosby, Jonathan Toews, Alex Ovechkin or Joe Thornton. If the Preds have a “superstar” it’s Shea Weber and he’s a defenseman with 16 goals. The only forward with a “big” name, even in Nashville, is Martin Erat because he’s played his entire nine-year NHL career in Nashville. He had one more goal than Weber this season.

Call it odd, but the Nashville Predators didn’t realize what fame was until their general manager, David Poile (the only GM they’ve ever had), made a deal to acquire Mike Fisher. Fisher is a grinder who is only famous because he’s married to American Idol Carrie Underwood.

If there is a lunch bucket team in the NHL, it’s the Predators. And to their credit, they can all carry their lunch buckets into the second round of the playoffs for the first time in franchise history.

And the man who is truly responsible for this year’s success is a) the fiercest looking coach in the NHL and b) the nicest man in the game today.

Trotz is the only coach the Predators have ever had. He’s been in Nashville for the entire time the Preds have been the Preds. He has coached 985 consecutive games in Nashville. That’s the NHL record for most games coached from the start of a franchise’s history.

In fact, the 48-year-old Trotz, has been with the Predators since their inaugural season in 1998. His overall record is 455-398-60-71 and while that doesn’t sound like much, one must consider that the expansion Preds didn’t have a winning record until the 2003-04 season. However, since the 2004-05 lockout, Trotz’s Predators have gone 272-174-0-50 and on Sunday night, as the Preds reached the second round of the playoffs for the first time in history, it had become apparent that no coach in the NHL does as much with as little as Barry Trotz.

This past season, the best coach in the NHL coaxed his team to a 44-27-11 record, fifth in the West. He’s now taken out the No. 4 team in the conference and won’t know his team’s next opponent until, at least, tomorrow.

Trotz, who was born in Dauphin, spent three seasons with the Western Hockey League’s Regina Pats and then went to the University of Manitoba where he still believed he could make it to the NHL one day. Trouble was, he’d been injured in the off-season when he was 19 and the pain just wouldn’t go away.

“I hurt my back in the summer of 1982 and it just never got better,” Trotz told me in 1999. “It was my lower-back and I tried to play through the pain for a year at the U of M, but I just couldn’t do it. It got so bad that I could barely walk. With some rest, I tried to go out to training camp the next year, hoping I could get back by Christmas, but I had nothing. It wasn’t coming around and then one day, the head coach at the U of M, Wayne Fleming, asked me to become his assistant.”

The next season Trotz took over as coach and general manager of his hometown Manitoba Junior Hockey League club, the Dauphin Kings, but then moved back to the U of M as a 26-year-old head coach while Fleming went to Europe on a sabbatical. When Fleming returned, Trotz stayed on as his assistant and picked up a side job as a regional scout with the Washington Capitals.

In 1990, the Capitals asked him to join their farm team, the Baltimore Skipjacks of the AHL as an assistant and Trotz jumped at the chance. He eventually became the team’s head coach and when the Skipjacks folded, he took a job as head coach of the AHL franchise in Portland, Me. There, he won a Calder Cup, and when his old boss, former Caps GM Poile became the first GM of the Nashville Predators, he immediately hired Trotz as his first head coach.

They have seldom missed a day together since.

“Barry is the fairest-minded, most honest coach in the game,” Poile once said. “His players love him and will do anything for him because there are no mind games, no favorites, no phoniness. Barry Trotz is a very good human being and as a result, an extremely good coach.”

Indeed. And now, maybe, just maybe, this year he’ll finally be recognized as the best coach in the National Hockey League.

(Portions of this updated post originally appeared at www.fantrax.com)

 

 

 

 

 

Should There Be More Teams in the Stanley Cup Playoffs?

TAMPA, Fla. — Dallas Stars scouting director, Les Jackson, believes the National Hockey League needs to add more teams to the post-season. Not necessarily for the sake of competition as much as for the sake of the business.

Friday night I was sitting with Jackson, an old friend from way back in the days when he coached the Brandon Wheat Kings, at the Lightning-Rangers game in Tampa and he asked an interesting question: “Why wouldn’t the NHL want to add eight more teams to the playoffs every year? Why wouldn’t the league want to do everything to help its members make some money?”

It was a nell of a question. According to Jackson, if more teams made the playoffs fewer would lose big money. It makes overwhelming sense and, with some thought, it could be practical, too.

“Back in the glory days of the six-team NHL, four of six teams made the playoffs. If you carried that on to today, it means the league should have 20 teams in the playoffs. So why not 24? Why not give the teams that are in tough hockey markets a chance to sell the game in the post-season? Everybody loves the playoffs. Why not let more teams have the chance to enjoy the playoffs?”

It would be easy to say, “We don’t want more teams in the playoffs because it makes the regular season less important,” but I understand what Jackson means even from the competitive standpoint. This year, a team that’s 10 games above .500 (Calgary) might miss the playoffs and two teams that are seven games above .500 (Anaheim and St. Louis) WILL miss the playoffs. Right now, seven teams with better than .500 records will miss the post-season.

If we were talking about crappy teams without a hope, I could understand why fans wouldn’t want to add any more teams. But this year, a load of teams that will miss the playoffs are probably good enough to challenge more than half the teams that make it. The competition would not suffer.

Jackson is right. The NHL should add at least four and maybe eight more teams to the post-season. It wouldn’t hurt the competition and it would definitely improve the business.

Things to Consider With Three Weeks to Go.

ST. PAUL, Minn. — While the general managers and the league’s other tall foreheads try to come to terms with illegal checks to the head (sorry, boys, but the rulebook is full of rules that would get headshots out of the game), the rest of the NHL is just playing hockey.

So with about three weeks to play before the Stanley Cup playoffs are upon us, let’s take a look at the league from a Winnipeg perspective:

1) Although he says he has not completely made up his mind, it appears that after 18 seasons, former Winnipeg Jets captain Keith Tkachuk is nearing the end of his brilliant career.

Saying his future in St. Louis is now, Tkachuk wouldn’t admit whether or not he was retiring at the end of the season, but he did say, “I often think about this being the end.” No doubt, the Hall of Fame awaits.

2) Remember when the San Jose Sharks had a very comfortable 12-point lead in the Pacific Division? Well, not anymore. That’s because the Phoenix Coyotes have won seven straight and have moved to within three points (at the beginning of the weekend) of the heavily favored and quite talented division leaders.

The 44-22-5 Coyotes have all but assured themselves of a spot in the post-season for the first time since 2002. Now, however, they are closing in on home ice advantage in the West. This should be a great finish.

3) By now, it has to be official. There is no better coach in the NHL than Dauphin’s Barry Trotz (OK, maybe Dave Tippett in Phoenix, but nobody else). Trotz, the only coach the Nashville Predators have ever had, has the no-name, star-less Predators in seventh place five points ahead up on eight-place Detroit (at the start of the weekend).

That shouldn’t happen. The Preds just don’t have the personnel. But Trotz has made them a playoff contender – they beat L.A. on the road this week and have won four straight — and that says more about his brilliance than anything else.

4) Calling it “a retaliatory hit to the head,” the National Hockey League suspended Anaheim Ducks defenseman James Wisniewski for eight games without pay for that terrible hit to the face and head of Brent Seabrook on Wednesday night.

Wisniewski definitely gave Seabrook a cheap shot, but an eight-game suspension after giving Alexander Ovechkin only two? The NHL justice department is completely nonsensical.

5) The Montreal Canadiens have looked very good at times this season. They’ve had two four-game winning streaks. But not until the Olympic break, have the Habs put together so many outstanding games in succession. In fact, with six straight wins heading into the weekend, Montreal has moved into the playoff driver’s seat in the East.

After Tuesday night’s game, a 3-1 win over the Rangers at Madison Square Garden, the Habs moved past Philly and into sixth place in the Eastern Conference (later in the week they fell back into seventh). The Bruins are eighth with 74 points, four points back, while ninth-place Atlanta and the Rangers are seven points back. With only 12 to play, the red-hot Habs are in control of their own playoff destiny.

6) Perhaps no one has noticed, but Winnipeg’s Travis Zajac is having a season to remember. Zajac, the 24-year-old rightwinger out of the University of North Dakota has moved into the Top 35 in NHL scoring with 21 goals and 38 assists.

Perhaps more importantly, the 6-foot-3, 200-pounder, is a terrific plus-14. By the time the next Olympics roll around, he’ll be one of the best players in the game, if he isn’t already.

No Need To Worry About Getzlaf. He’s Ready to Play.

Evidently Ryan Getzlaf is ready to play in the Olympic Games. Jeff Carter can stay home.

When Canada opens the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Hockey Tournament, Getzlaf will be in the lineup after a remarkable performance on Sunday night.

Now, in case you missed it, Getzlaf injured his ankle last Monday, didn’t play on Saturday in Calgary and there was a real concern that he might not be ready for the Games. Team Canada GM Steve Yzerman even called Philadelphia Flyers forward Jeff Carter and told him to be ready to play.

But on Sunday night in Edmonton, Getzlaf left no doubt he’d be ready to go. The big Anaheim Ducks rightwinger scored two third-period goals and dished out a pair of assists as his four-point night led the Ducks to a 7-3 road win over the lowly Oilers.

“In my mind, it’s pretty made up,” Getzlaf told nhl.com. “Obviously I would like to be there.”

As he showed on Sunday night, if he’s not there, there are bigger problems than a sore ankle.

Canada’s Olympic Hockey Team in Flux. Carter Off to Vancouver.

Team Canada GM Steve Yzerman wants Philadelphia Flyers forward Jeff Carter to fly to Vancouver.

That doesn’t mean there is a guarantee that Carter will suit up for Team Canada in next week’s 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics, but it’s beginning to appear as if Ryan Getzlaff’s injured ankle might not allow the big Ducks forward to be 100 per cent for the Games.

Gertzlaf will likely play for the Ducks on Sunday night, the last night of the NHL’s regular schedule until the end of the Olympics. If Getzlaf looks shaky or misses a few shifts because of the injury, it’s likely Team Canada will opt to go with a replacement. In Torino in 2006, the Canadians used Wade Redden and Chris Pronger, even though they were both injured and neither one of them played up to the level necessary to win a medal in an Olympic hockey competition. According to Canadian assistant coach Ken Hitchcock, that situation will not occur in Vancouver.

“Earlier today, I contacted Jeff Carter of the Philadelphia Flyers and advised him that in the event that Ryan Getzlaf is unable to take part in the 2010 Olympic Winter Games due to injury, he will take his spot on the roster,” Yzerman said in a written statement. “I asked him to be ready and be prepared to play in case he has to join us in Vancouver later this week.

“In the meantime, we will give ourselves, Ryan and the Anaheim Ducks as much time this week as necessary to determine if he will be able to play for Canada in Vancouver.”

If Getzlaff doesn’t look good on Sunday night, expect Carter to play.

Remember every Team Canada game at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics will be broadcast live on 92-CITI-FM in Winnipeg. The first game is Tuesday night at 6 p.m. as Canada faces Norway.

Leafs Change Course. Team Barely Recognizable.

Toronto Maple Leafs general manager Brian Burke did not mince words yesterday.

After cutting two huge deals, one with the Calgary Flames and the other with the Anaheim Ducks, Burke quipped: ”We’re still open for business. We’re not done.”

Obviously, Burke has decided that his lousy Leafs were indeed really, really lousy, so it’s time to overhaul the franchise.

On Sunday, Burke shipped out six players and got four in return.

First, the Leafs sent their best player so far this year, Steinbach’s Ian White, along with Matt Stajan, Nicklas Hagman and Jamal Mayers to the Calgary Flames in exchange for defensemen Dion Phaneuf and Keith Aulie and winger Fredrik Sjostrom. Then, the Leafs dealt goalie Vesa Toskala and forward Jason Blake to Anaheim in exchange for goaltender Jean-Sebastien Giguere.

Wow! At 17-28-11, the Leafs were desperate. Now they’re younger. But are they better?

“It was definitely a shock, but I’m very excited about going to Toronto and being a Maple Leaf,” Phaneuf told TSN.

“It’s a cliche. If Wayne Gretzky can get traded, anyone can get traded. I was very surprised, but on the other hand I’m very excited to be going to the biggest hockey market in the world.”

I understand that when a player is traded he has to say nice things about his new team. And I also understand that Canadian-born hockey players always say the right thing. I get all that. But in this case Phaneuf is lying through his mouthguard.

Saturday he was playing defence on a team in a big slump, but a team that will still make the playoffs. Sunday, he finds himself playing for a team that won’t finish .500.

The Leafs, after all, are tied with Carolina for last-place overall in the Eastern Conference.

In the end yesterday, the Leafs gave up White (a plus-one on a minus-48 team who was having a career year and always said he was “honoured” to be a Toronto Maple Leaf), Stajan, Hagman, Mayers, Toskala and Blake — six NHL-caliber players — and got Phaneuf, Aulie, Sjostrom and Giguere — three NHLers and a Marlie — in return.

Does that make them better? One can’t imagine.

After all, the Leafs were 11 games under .500 after a loss to Vancouver on Saturday. One day later they’re barely recognizable.

Fraud and Lies Beget Fraud and Lies

Fraud and lies. That’s the NHL way. And it just never stops.

Every hockey fan with a brain bigger than a walnut knows that lying is a way of life in the NHL, but commissioner Gary Bettman, a man the Winnipeg Sun called a “rat-weasel” in a headline on Sunday, would sure like everyone to think differently.

According to a court filing from Jerry Moyes, the man on the hook for the monstrous debts of the Phoenix Coyotes, the people for whom he ran the Phoenix franchise seem to lie for fun: “The National Hockey League acted fraudulently in its bid to take control of the Phoenix Coyotes,” Moyes claimed this past week. “And the NHL’s current position proves the fraudulent inducement claim.”

Funny how the word fraud always comes up in any court filing involving Bettman’s NHL.

In fact, we pointed out earlier here at rivercitysportsblog.com that at least six of the NHL’s most prominent owners were convicted (or are in court facing charges) of fraud. To review:

1) When he took over as commissioner, one of his closest friends and supporters inside the league was Los Angeles Kings owner Bruce McNall. McNall went to jail for fraud.

2) Former Islanders owner John Spano was sentenced in January of 2000 to 71 months in federal prison for bank fraud.

3) Later in the Isles ownership history, long after former Coyotes owner Steven Gluckstern nearly went broke owning the franchise, Bettman brought in Charles Wang and Sanjay Kumar. Kumar is now serving a 12-year sentence for a multi-billion dollar fraud. 

4) Bettman also needed help after Buffalo Sabres owner Seymour Knox died in 1996, so he found cable TV magnate John Rigas. In 2002, while he was the Sabres owner, Rigas was convicted of, you guessed it, fraud. He’s still in prison.

5) Then came former Anaheim Ducks owner Henry Samueli. He’s a big time crook who, among other things, lied to the SEC about his role in a $2.2 billion stock-option scam. He’s currently doing his time. 

6) Then there was “Bootsie.” With the Nashville Predators in bankruptcy protection, Bettman refused to sell the team to Balsillie because Balsillie wanted to move it to Canada. So Bettman went out and found a wealthy venture capitalist named William (Bootsie) Del Biaggio III. It seemed like a good idea at the time, I guess, but it wasn’t long before Bootsie was facing fraud charges brought on by everybody from the SEC to Luc Robitaille to Joe Montana. Bootsie hasn’t gone to jail yet, but there are a lot of people who would like to see him in the crow bar hotel. Today, he faces a six year term. 

Meanwhile, Bettman’s pals have been saying Balsillie is “very brash” and “doesn’t want to play by the rules.” What rules? There are no rules. And if there are, Bettman will change them as he goes.

Don’t believe me? There are plenty of examples, including this current one:

Bettman claims Moyes handed over control of the Coyotes to the NHL last November in return for financing, and that a team of league officials has been running day to day operations ever since. However, just as Bettman himself claimed for six months, Moyes has now filed an affidavit saying that the league never had control of the team and “did not want control.”

Moyes added: “By taking a different position now, the league is trying to fraudulently take the Phoenix Coyotes franchise away from me.”

Moyes has argued from the start of this proceeding that NHL officials have made it clear since Day 1 that after the financing was arranged, in November of 2008, the league “did not plan to operate the club and that the arrangment didn’t change anything in terms of how the club was run.”

According to documents filed in court: “The league did not have day to day control, but merely received weekly financial updates.”

Meanwhile, Bettman lies with such ease, you’d think he was Dick Cheney.

On his Sirius XM Radio show, Bettman said, “Ripping a franchise out of one city in violation of League rules and procedures to put it somewhere else isn’t the way we do business. and comparisons to Quebec and Winnipeg aren’t valid, because we couldn’t find anybody who wanted to own the teams there.”

I don’t know about Quebec, but as it pertains to Winnipeg, that is an outright lie.

Winnipeg had an ownership group in place, but Bettman looked me right in the eye and claimed that group ownership was not permitted in the NHL. He wanted one owner, period. No groups.

Then, after he ripped the Jets out of Winnipeg and shipped them to Phoenix for the 13-year disaster, he allowed an ownership group in Edmonton. 

The truth and Gary Bettman are strangers.

On to the Conference finals: We like Wings and Pens — Again — in the Stanley Cup final

For those of us trying to make money in the wonderful world of Sport Select, the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs have been a pretty decent source of revenue. 

Granted, after two rounds, the two top seeds — the Boston Bruins in the East and the San Jose harks in the West — are gone, but for the most part, the teams we have selected to reach the Conference Finals, have indeed reached the Conference finals.

Pittsburgh, with Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin will face Carolina with Eric Staal (our darkhorse pick as a Stanley Cup finalist) in the Eastern final, while the “Winnipeg” teams, Chicago with captain Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith and Cam Barker against Detroit, with Darren Helm and Derek Meech, are in the Western final.

That’s obviously the way it should be.

For the record, here at rcsportsblog.com (you can follow us on twitter), we went 7-1 in the first round and 3-1 in Round 2. The only outcome we did not select correctly in Round 1 was, of course, Anaheim’s upset of Jonathan Cheechoo’s San Jose Sharks and our only incorrect choice in Round 2 was Carolina’s Game 7 upset of the No. 1-ranked Boston Bruins.

Interestingly, we also said that the two most interesting — and exciting — series would be Chicago-Vancouver and Pittsburgh-Washington. They were.

So on with the Show. Here’s our look at the third round, the conference finals, of the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs.

ROUND THREE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

No. 4 Pittsburgh Penguins vs. No. 6 Carolina Hurricanes

The Pens won the season series 2-1-1 and were not only in last year’s Stanley Cup final, but have five players with Stanley Cup rings. They obviously have enough experience to handle this series against a team that won the Cup in 2006 and still have 10 players from that team. The Pens have the stars in Crosby, Malkin, Gonchar and Jordan Staal, but Carolina has so much grit and character, that it’s impossible to count them out. It also doesn’t hurt that when it looked like this team was out of it back in February, goalie Cam Ward went 14-4-2 over the final 20 games. Ward won the Conn Smythe Trophy in 2006 and will have to be that good again against all the Pittsburgh firepower. We like the Penguins in five.

WESTERN CONFERENCE

No. 2 Detroit Red Wings vs. No. 4 Chicago Blackhawks

The Red Wings are the defending Stanley Cup champions and they’re certainly good enough to win it again. In fact, the Red Wings have the best team in the National Hockey League. They roll four strong lines, have a Norris Trophy defenceman in Nick Lidstrom and an MVP-calibre forward in Pavel Datsyuk, they are well-coached and have better goaltending (Chris Osgood) than the Eastern media will ever give credit. The Wings won the season series against the upstart Hawks, but when asked about this matchup, I always see that January 1, outdoor game at Wrigley Field, the one in which the Hawks rode the home crowd to an early lead and then collapsed under the weight of the Wings speed and talent. The most important thing the Hawks have going for them is youth and enthusiasm and, hey, that might carry them, but we like Detroit in six.

Three things rattling around in my brain…

I have a few more things rattling around in my cranium other than this, but after crunchy peanut butter and last night’s Power Ball numbers, these are the only things that would likely matter to anyone else…

1) NHL commissioner Gary Bettman gets more hypocritical every day. He says he wants to do whatever he can for his owners, but when one gets in serious trouble — like Jerry Moyes in Phoenix — Bettman throws him under the bus.

Here is the latest response by Jim Balsillie to a court filing by the National Hockey League:

HAMILTON, ON, May 14 /CNW/ – Jim Balsillie today issued the following statement with regard to NHL motions filed in a Phoenix bankruptcy court: 

   … “I can tell you this. I made a generous good faith offer to buy the Coyotes from Jerry Moyes, who I understand is the owner of the Coyotes. Who owns or controls the team is a distinction without a difference. The team itself is still bankrupt, voluntarily or not. The owner of the team has a fiduciary obligation towards the creditors.

       “My offer, which goes the furthest in satisfying creditors’ claims, is still the same. It’s $212 million to buy the Coyotes and bring them to the best un-served hockey market in the world in Southern Ontario. We look forward to discussing this no matter what the outcome on May 19th.

    “At the end of the day, this is about the passion Canadians feel for the game of hockey and a chance to provide those fans with the opportunity to support a seventh NHL team. That’s what this is all about, great hockey fans in a great hockey market.”

Sadly, Gary Bettman wouldn’t know a good hockey market or a good hockey fan if one tripped and fell over his throat.

Why Bettman hates Canada and, for the most part, hates the game of hockey, is a mystery.

2) Remember Jean-Sebastien Giguere? In case you don’t, he led the Anaheim Ducks to the Stanley Cup in 2007.

Giguere is still in Anaheim, but he doesn’t play much anymore. the hero in Anaheim is now Jonas Hiller, a guy who already has three rings — for the championship of the Swiss League, in 2002, 2005 and 2007. He’s also won two Spengler Cups with Davos.

Of course, if the Ducks win Game 7 against Detroit tonight, he just could win another ring this year. Along with a Conn Smythe Trophy as the playoff MVP.

Or, he could lose and join Roberto Luongo and Simeon Varlamov in 2009 post-season infamy.

It should be a great game tonight. 

3) Finally, in the CFL, the league announced four rule changes that were suggested by the fans in an online poll:

          a) The league’s board of governors approved moving the kickoff back 10 yards to the 25-yard line following a safety.

          b) Allowing coaches to use “wildcat” formations that would move the quarterback around, instead of requiring him to stand behind or under centre.

          c) Requiring a team that makes a field goal to kick off rather than give the receiving the team the option of taking the ball at its 35-yard-line.

         d) Giving a team a third instant replay challenge if its first two are successful.

I have no problem with any of those rules changes. I guess I’m just like a lot of fans. I didn’t think the quarterback was stuck behind centre anyway, didn’t care if a team kicked from the 35 or 25 after a safety and didn’t realize that taking the ball at the 35 or kicking off mattered that much.

My rule change remains the same: If a CFL team uses a Canadian (non-import) as its No. 3 quarterback, it can use an extra import in the starting line-up. At some point, we must — in our own league — make it worth the coaches’ while to develop Canadian  quarterbacks, just like they develop U.S. college rookies.

On to the Second Round: We like Chicago in an upset, Pens in a thriller plus the Wings and Bruins.

For the longest time, we have believed that the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs is the most exciting.

What the hell, there are 16 teams. Of course, it will be exciting.

This year, however, we seem to be a little more enthused about Round 2. After all, in Round 1 this year, it went pretty much as we expected — and when I say “we,” I mean everyone who follows hockey closely.

With the exception of those who always believe (for reasons I still don’t understand) that Detroit will be upset in the first round, most hockey people picked at least six of the opening round series correctly.

For the record, here at rcsportsblog.com (you can follow us on twitter), we went 7-1 in the first round. The only outcome we did not select correctly was, of course, Anaheim’s upset of Jonathan Cheechoo’s San Jose Sharks.

Round 2 will provide us with two spectacular match-ups: Chicago and Vancouver and Pittsburgh and Washington. I can almost guarantee that those two series will double the excitement we saw in any series in Round 1.

So on with the show. Here’s our look at Round 2 of the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs…

ROUND TWO

EASTERN CONFERENCE

No. 1 Boston Bruins vs. No. 6 Carolina Hurricanes

The Bruins played wonderfully in taking out the Montreal Canadiens in the opening round in four straight games. Everything about this team, that now has home ice advantage throughout the playoffs as long as it keeps winning, screams “Eastern Division Champion!” Tim Thomas has been sensational in goal, the big defence led by Zdeno Chara and Dennis Wideman moves the puck quickly and does a solid job of clearing the zone and the forward lines were nearly flawless in Round 1. And while we took Carolina to knock off New Jersey in Round 1, the dream ends here. The Bruins dominated the Hurricanes during the regular season, winning all four meetings by a combined score of 18-6. There is no reason for that to stop. Bruins in five games.

No. 2 Washington Capitals vs. No. 4 Pittsburgh Penguins

On the surface, this looks like a great series/ Alexander Ovechkin and Alexander Semin of the Caps against Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby of the Penguins. Big names, big stars, should be exciting. However, the Capitals took three of four from the Penguins during the regular season and Washington’s only loss was the result of a shootout. Pittsburgh beat a tough Flyers team in six games, mainly because Philly’s goaltending was lousy. The Caps have not had lousy goaltending since the day head coach Bruce Boudreau decided to go with Simeon Varlamov. Still, the Caps were lucky to beat a dysfunctional Rangers team. Pittsburgh in seven games.

WESTERN CONFERENCE

No. 2 Detroit Red Wings vs. No. 8 Anaheim Ducks

The Red Wings should waltz through this second round match-up against a team that was very lucky to make the playoffs. Thanks to the fact the San Jose Sharks seldom if ever bring their A game (or raise their level of play) to the playoff dance, the defending Stanley Cup champs get a team with a hot goalie and not much else. This season, the well-balanced, well-disciplined Red Wings went 3-0-1 against Anaheim. As TSN says, “The Red Wings sacrifice individual glory for what is best for the team, which speaks to the professionalism of those inside the organization.” Detroit has the best team in the NHL and while I love the Ducks’ Teemu Selanne and Randy Carlyle, the Red Wings win in four games.

No. 3 Vancouver Canucks vs. No. 4 Chicago Blackhawks

Potentially, this is the best and definitely, the most exciting series of the second round. The teams went 2-2 against each other this season and this series should go right to the wire every single night. Both teams have exciting young players and, frankly, a match-up of Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane and Patrick Sharp against the Sedin Twins  and Alex Burrows, is more intriguing to me than the Crosby-Ovechkin dance. Ultimately, this series will come down to goaltending. Is Nikolai Khabibulin as good as Roberto Luongo when it counts? Stay tuned. This will be a dandy. Right now, I like Chicago in seven games.