Tag Archives: barry bonds

Judge Tells Justice System and Media, Chasing Bonds Was a Worthless Waste of Effort and Money

ap barry bonds steroid tk 111216 wg 300x168 Judge Tells Justice System and Media, Chasing Bonds Was a Worthless Waste of Effort and Money

Bonds Arrives at Court in San Francisco

It was wonderful to read how the mainstream media in the United States spun last week’s Barry Bonds sentencing.

Here’s AP’s take: “SAN FRANCISCO — Eight years of being investigated for steroid allegations ended for home run king Barry Bonds on Friday with a 30-day sentence to be served at home. No more – and maybe less.

“U.S. District Judge Susan Illston immediately delayed imposing the sentence while Bonds appeals his obstruction of justice conviction. The former baseball star was found guilty in April not of using steroids, but of misleading grand jurors.

“Even without prison time, the case has left its mark on the seven-time National League MVP. His 762 career home runs, and 73 homers in 2001, may forever be seen as tainted records, and his ticket to baseball’s Hall of Fame is in doubt.”

A guy virtually gets off what could have been 15-month-five-year sentence and the media is more concerned about whether or not the guy is going to get into the Hall of Fame. That’s all the big U.S. media had left.

There was no mention of Illston’s obvious determination that Bonds did virtually nothing wrong. While the American media and what was left of the old Bush Justice System screamed for the guy’s head, Illston calmly brought down a sentence that doesn’t even rate as punishment — for anything. And she did it because she still isn’t certain Bonds did anything wrong.

In total, Bonds was sentenced to two years of probation, 250 hours of community service, a $4,000 fine and 30 days of home confinement. According to AP, “It will take time to determine whether he serves any of it (or pays even a nickel); his appellate specialist, Dennis Riordan, estimated it would take nearly a year and a half for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rule.”

The assistant U.S. attorney, a beaten man named Matthew Parrella, who so doggedly wanted Bonds to go to jail forever for allegedly using steroids and cheating on his wife (honestly), called the sentence “a slap on the wrist.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Parrella called the sentence a “slap on the wrist” and then told reporters outside the court room: “The fine was almost laughable for a superstar athlete who made more than $192 million for playing baseball.”

Parrella wanted Bonds to serve 15 months in federal prison and told Ilston, “Home confinement isn’t punishment enough for a man with a 15,000-square-foot house with all the advantages.”

By the way, Bonds owns a six-bedroom, 10-bath home with a gym and a pool.

In other words, the judge said “you idiots have all wasted your time.” The feds chased Bonds for eight years and spent 10s of millions on dollars on “the case.” And what was the case? That Bonds used steroids? No, that he lied to a grand jury about it.

In hundreds of cases during the 2000s, federal justice officials in the United States could never a get a conviction on the charges that were brought into court. So they chased people down with “the lying to the grand jury” chestnut. Parrella and his ilk had nothing on Bonds after wasting millions and millions in taxpayers’ money so they went after him for lying to the grand jury.

In the end Parrella was so apoplectic about Bonds that he threw a temper tantrum in front of reporters. He looked and sounded cartoonish as he ripped Bonds for everything he couldn’t prove and things that aren’t even against the law. He sounded like a nine-year-old who didn’t get his way.

barry bonds hawaii 235x300 Judge Tells Justice System and Media, Chasing Bonds Was a Worthless Waste of Effort and Money

Bonds and Second Wife Liz Watson

“The defendant basically lived a double life for decades before this,” Parrella told the court. “He used performance-enhancing drugs and had mistresses throughout his marriages. He made all that money because he used steroids and he has been unrepentant and unapologetic about it.”

Illston virtually laughed at Parrella. “He wasn’t convicted of adultery,” she snapped.

Illston told the court that the alleged use of steroids and the way Bonds lived his personal life had nothing to do with the sentencing. She said she agreed with a probation department report that called Bonds’ conviction an “aberration” in his life. She said she received dozens of letters in support of Bonds, some discussing how he has given money and time “for decades” to charitable causes.

And did that ever piss off the U.S. media.

At the end of the AP story, the reporters wrote of Bonds and Roger Clemens, whose first trial was tossed out of court because the idiot prosecutors used evidence they knew was inadmissable: “Both men will face a different judgment day in 2013, when they’ll be eligible for the Hall of Fame.”

6a00d83451d69069e200e54f9c8e038834 800wi 300x223 Judge Tells Justice System and Media, Chasing Bonds Was a Worthless Waste of Effort and Money

Bonds Near the End of his Career.

It sounded like a threat. The Baseball Writers Association of America — the same buffoons who refused to say a discouraging word about any of the steroid use in baseball while it was going on — couldn’t get Bonds convicted, so now they’ll do what they’ve done to everyone else they’ve perceived to have used steroids (they really don’t have any idea that anyone used it unless someone has admitted to it) and should be eligible for the Hall of Fame. They’ve gone out of their way to keep them out.

Lester Munson, the Republican lawyer who works for ESPN, nearly wet his pants: “The federal judge who presided over the Bonds trial is Susan Illston. She is a San Francisco Democrat and a bit of an enigma… It was one of many decisions made in the course of the BALCO prosecutions that indicated Judge Illston just didn’t get it.” Yes she did. She ‘got it’ completely.

Munson wanted Bonds convicted and sentenced to life so badly that he lost all objectivity. If you listen to Munson enough, you realize he’s one of these ideologues who believes that everyone is guilty until proven innocent. He also gets pissy when a judge doesn’t agree with his pre-determined assessment.

Look, Bonds is probably guilty of using steroids (at a time when it wasn’t against the rules of in baseball). He obviously lied to somebody because he was convicted of it. The problem was, the United States government, the one that Republicans claim is flat broke, spent millions and millions of dollars over eight years on a blind, pointless witch hunt designed to destroy somebody who did nothing more — or less — than play baseball in the Steroid Era.

Who cares if Bonds was convicted and who cares that he wasn’t sentenced to years in the joint? At this stage, eight years after the witch hunt began, the entire exercise was proven to be a meaningless waste of effort that did nothing except make a pile of lawyers richer than they were at the start.

Another Week in the Land of Incredulity

Forgive me my cynicism. I believe I have heard it all.

This has been an odd week.

1) By Thursday the mainstream American media had reached such a high level of mob mentality in its desperate need to have Barry Bonds convicted of something, that it turned a single conviction for obstruction of justice into something on par with a dozen convictions for mass murder.

At no time, in America’s recent past (excluding the ugly Duke University lacrosse case), has the media so desperately wanted someone to fry for something. For anything.

You could read the desperation in their stories every day:

From Mark Fainaru-Wada, the fraud who wrote the Game of Shadows with more than 200 unnamed sources: ”The jury deciding the Barry Bonds perjury and obstruction of justice case wasn’t provided information that the public has been informed about over the years through other court cases, investigations and documents.” Wah-ahhhh.

From Lester Munson of ESPN, whose anti-Bonds bias highlighted every one of his radio interviews this week: “Bonds attorney Cristina Arguedas, a skilled advocate, worked hard for 51 minutes in a cross-examination of Hoskins and succeeded only in enhancing Hoskins’ veracity. Arguedas, who wears over-sized and mismatched outfits in court, tried to question Hoskins on style. Big mistake. The jurors and the courtroom audience erupted in laughter as Hoskins defined style for Arguedas.” And that proved?

And this is my favorite, from the New York Times: “Even if he is cleared of all charges Bonds will not go unpunished. Now aged 46, he has to all intents and purposes been run out of baseball, shunned by the Major League clubs, all of which passed on the opportunity to sign him, and booed by fans during rare public appearances.”

The media hated this guy and wanted to make sure everyone else did. I interviewed him once in the Giants’ clubhouse in 2002 and he was just fine. I asked him baseball questions, he answered them and that was it. Two guys just doing their jobs. I didn’t care if he liked me. I didn’t care if I ever saw him again. I had a job to do and he let me do it.

But my goodness, there are so many people in the media who just hate this man. And they hate him as much for their own role in ignoring the McGuire-Sosa steroid issue in 1998, as they do for Bonds’ inability to believe the media is somehow important.

Originally, there were 11 charges against Bonds. Six were dropped before the trial, one more was dropped on Day 1 of the trial and of the four remaining charges, all the Department of Justice could do was get Bonds convicted on a nebulous obstruction of justice charge. Then those morons went to their  newspaper cronies and declared victory. Stunning.

However, according to Bonds’ lawyer Allen Ruby: “The government has sought and at least for now” won conviction against Bonds for telling “the grand jury that he was a celebrity child and for saying he was friends with Greg Anderson.” After almost a decade, after more than $400 million and after being egged on by a media horde that was nearly insane in its hatred for a baseball player, that’s all the federal department of justice could get.

To his credit, Sean Gregory of TIME Magazine had the best summation of the Bonds witch-hunt:

“Fans surely weren’t as concerned with these questions back in 2005, when Congress held hearings about baseball’s laughable policing of steroid use. But now what’s the incremental benefit of this trial? It’s certainly not teaching any new lessons. We all know steroids are dangerous, that cheating and lying are immoral. A Bonds conviction won’t add any significant strength to that message. Sure, you can say Bonds deserves to sit through a trial, and perhaps go to jail, because he lied under oath. But is spending so much time and money chasing a liar worth the cost? Especially since many people have lied about worse things, like violent criminal acts, under oath, but have escaped prosecution.

“The Bonds case could also bode well for (Roger) Clemens, and maybe Lance Armstrong. The perjury trial against Clemens, who denied using performance-enhancing drugs to Congress, starts in July. Can the public stomach any more federal expenditures in pursuit of a jock who hasn’t played in three years? And if the government eventually indicts Armstrong, who has also denied drug use despite rumors and reports to the contrary, will that case be worth it too? He last won a Tour de France in 2005. Many of his competitors probably cheated, so he may have gained no real advantage even if he had used performance-enhancing drugs. And his prodigious fundraising efforts on behalf of cancer research will always make him a hero to many.

“The government needs to move on, just like the public it supposedly serves.”

Thank you, Sean Gregory.

2) This week, here in Winnipeg, we have once again read that the return of the NHL to our city is imminent. We’ve have not read any direct quotes that would suggest it is imminent, but the belief is clear: The NHL is coming back, maybe even as soon as this week.

My problem with that is four-fold. There are only four things I have heard that people in the NHL or people involved with the deal will put their names to:

a) That the alleged deal in the desert is not done and that the NHL will continue to be patient and attempt to make the bond sale work (from NHL assistant commissioner Bill Daly).

b) That time is certainly running out on the City of Glendale, Ariz., but there is no deadline. The only deadline the NHL set was Dec. 31, 2010 and it was ignored (from NHL commissioner Gary Bettman).

c) That the NHL has brought high-powered Arizona lawyer John Kaites back onto the scene in hopes that he can fix the political mess in the desert (from John Kaites).

d) That potential owner, Matthew Hulsizer says he hasn’t backed down, will still honor his original agreement and if the city can sell the bonds, he’ll assume ownership of the team (from Matthew Hulsizer).

It seems everyone is convinced the Coyotes will be moving to Winnipeg soon, but no one at the executive level of the NHL, no one close to the potential ownership group in Winnipeg (that one I certainly understand) and no one in Arizona will put their names to that claim.

Until that happens, which we’re told could very well could happen after the Coyotes are eliminated from the playoffs, I’ll keep waiting for the official announcement.

3) The Boston Red Sox entered Saturday’s play 2-10 while the Cleveland Indians were 9-4.

Addition:  The Red Sox finished Saturday 3-10 while the Indians won again and are now 10-4. Amazing.

It was just an odd week.

A Week in the Trenches: How the Media Makes Mountains Out of Mole Hills.

Sometimes you read a newspaper and just shake your head. Sadly, far too many people read them and then read irrational things into them.

Obviously, that’s what they’re going for, those old broken down newspaper folks. At a time when the daily reading of newsprint has lost its lustre because, well, everything in it is yesterday’s news, you have a dilemma.

The question: How to entice readers? The answer: Two ways. Either make stuff up or take stuff that isn’t made up and make a bigger deal out of that stuff than is warranted.

Mountains out of mile hills, as they say. And we’ve had a week of it.

1) When Detroit Tigers all-star first baseman (and almost American League MVP) is picked up on a DUI this week, the American newspaper world goes wacky. Apparently, having a player drink scotch and then get caught behind the wheel of a car after drinking scotch will alter the chemistry of a team. That’s what the newspaper pundits said this week. A collection of dudes who can neither throw nor catch decided that Cabrera’s drunk-driving charge would end all hope for the Tigers to win a Central Division title.

Really? Seriously? Not according to Tigers manager Jim Leyland. Leyland told the Detroit Free Press “I know for a fact, without getting into this situation, I know for a fact Miguel Cabrera is in the best shape of his life. He’s stronger than he’s ever been, and he’s quicker than he’s ever been . . . I think Miguel Cabrera is probably going to have the biggest year of his life.”

Of course, the Free Press didn’t agree with him. Certainly not Mitch Albom, who destroyed Cabrera in his column.

Leyland went off. Most of the Tigers players barely noticed. Even other Free Press reporters admitted they couldn’t find any trouble in the Tigers clubhouse

“It’s not going to affect the team at all,” Leyland said. “All these people that are getting dramatic about this . . . and all this negative impact. It’s not going to affect this team one bit. Trust me. That’s all reading material, everybody getting all upset and getting real dramatic.”

Here’s the deal. The guy screwed up. He’ll be punished. Will probably have to use some of his $13 million this year to hire a driver. End of story.

2) The Winnipeg Blue Bombers have decided not to spend wads of money on free agents this year. Instead, they want to get the players who played well last year under contract and then try to bolster their Canadian content (’bout freakin’ time).

The local papers haven’t been too happy about that, but on Friday night, head coach Paul LaPolice made it clear that he wasn’t in the least bit concerned.

“Well, for one thing, everybody is forgetting we got the best defensive co-ordinator in the league, Tim Burke, from Montreal,” LaPolice told the audience listening to the MJHL on NCI FM, just hours after the Blue had re-signed centre Obby Khan. “We lost nine games by four points or less last season. That has to change. But spending large amounts of money on free agents that may or may not pan out is not the way we want to go. I’ve watched the Washington Redskins do that for years and it hasn’t worked out for them.

“We believe we’ve built a very good young team here. Yes, if we want to BE better than 4-14, we have to play better than we did last year, but to me and to Mr. Mack (Bombers GM Joe Mack), our priority was to sign the young players we brought along last year, upgrade our coaching staff and make sure our core of veteran players are happy and ready to go. Doug Brown is back, Obby Khan is back, we’ve been monitoring (quarterback) Buck Pierce all winter — he moved here and he’s been working out every day —  and with addition of Tim and the naming of Richard Harris as assistant head coach, we’ve upgraded the coaching staff.

“Now, we just have to go out and get the job done.”

The Bombers will be fine. Stop making something out of nothing.

3)  On Friday, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, the federal jurist assigned to the perjury case against Barry Bonds, directed both sides to cut a deal.

Prosecutors responded to Illston’s request by saying they would discuss a plea agreement with Bonds’ lawyers, even though one of Bonds’ attorneys believed the case would go to trial. Bonds will plead “not guilty” for the third time when he is arraigned – again! — on March 1. He was initially charged in 2007 with lying to a grand jury about his alleged steroids use. The trial is scheduled to start March 21. Four freakin’ years after the only charge was laid and more than a decade since the government started chasing Bonds’ ass all over North America.

The North American mainstream media is desperate — absolutely desperate — to have Bonds convicted of something. Anything. Make it up. Just get him convicted. They’ve been trying Bonds for a dozen years in the court of public opinion and news that Illston wanted the prosecutors to cut a deal suggests that she isn’t convinced the feds have much of a case. The response from Bonds’ lawyers that the case will likely go to trial suggests that they know the feds don’t have much of a case.

Few people in history have spent as much time waiting for the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice to build a case as Barry Bonds. And what do they have for the hundreds of millions of public dollars that have been spent on this goofy case? They have a suggestion that Bonds might have known what his trainer was giving him and that because of this, Bonds hit a bunch of home runs in a bunch of stinkin’ baseball games and he should go to jail for eternity for doing that.

That’s messed up.

This is so silly. So incredibly stupid, that when we, up here in comfortable, quiet, well-educated Canada, make fun of Americans for being inherently dumb, this is all we need to use as an illustration. In a country that says its governments — both at the federal and state levels — are flat broke, is there a bigger waste of money in the entire world than using hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars to chase down a baseball player for using the juice to hit homers?

If indeed, the United States is broke, as the Republicans claim, then this is the reason it deserves to be broke.

The Response to A-Rod’s 600th Homer Has Me in a Quandary

Watching Yankee fans and the Yankee announcers on the YES Network  this afternoon, made me wonder whatever happened to the American baseball media’s mob war against steroid users?

Both the fans and the announcers fawned all over Alex Rodriguez as he hit his 600th career home run against the Toronto Blue Jays. Indeed, A-Rod has hit 600 in his career, one of only seven to do so, and the fans had every right to be part of the celebration.

However, as the media honored Rodriguez today — as they certainly should have — I had to question why the feat is wonderful for Rodriguez, an admitted steroid user, but 600 homers wasn’t so wonderful for Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa? Remember, A-Rod is an admitted steroid user. In the meantime, the U.S. federal government has been trying to build a case against Bonds for almost a decade and yet they still have nothing. Sosa has said publicly that he as never used steroids. Still, both have been convicted by the American mainstream media mob as steroids abusers, even though there is no proof, only conjecture, rumour and innuendo.

So while Bonds and Sosa continue to be villified, Rodriguez, an admitted steroid user, is hailed as one of the sport’s all-time greats.

I’m in a quandary. Were steroids good for some heroes and not good for others? Is it because A-Rod is a Yankee and all things Yankee seem to be cheered in the U.S.? This is a strange one.

Personally? Good for A-Rod. 600 home runs at a time when there were as many pitchers (maybe more) on the juice as hitters, is quite an accomplishment.

More Stuff Rattling Around in My Head.

I’m in the I-told-you-so mood. And the cranky mood. And the really disgusted mood.

So here’s what’s making me goofy today…

1) The Associated Press wrote a story about Selena Roberts’ book on Alex Rodriguez today. Evidently, A-Rod: The Many Lives of Alex Rodriguez, that made-up piece of garbage by a woman who went to the same journalism school as those famous and successful let’s-make-it-up artists, Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams, has not been a big seller. Evidently, baseball fans don’t cotton to books filled with hundreds of un-named sources.

Now, in case you forgot, Fainaru-Wada and Williams were the dynamic duo wrote the book Game of Shadows using more than 225 un-named sources. That book turned out to be a very successful effort to vilify Barry Bonds, even though most of it was rubbish (one even two or three un-named sources is acceptable, hundreds make a story rubbish).

Roberts, meanwhile, is the woman who jumped to the wrong conclusion and slandered the lacrosse players at Duke University, only to have all of her vitriol turned to urine by a judge who threw the charges against the players out of court. She never apologized, only wallowed in her hubris — and got better journalism jobs.

Seems now that the rip on A-Rod as fallen on few eyes.According to the AP, the book was published in early May by HarperCollins with an announced first printing of 150,000. It has sold just 16,000 copies so far, according to Nielsen BookScan, which tracks about 75 percent of industry sales. The book sold 11,000 in its first week, then quickly faded. The book “A-Rod” fell off The New York Times‘ hardcover list of nonfiction best sellers after three weeks. According to AP, “As of Wednesday afternoon, the book ranked No. 2,904 on Amazon.com, where even James Frey’s discredited memoir A Million Little Pieces — at 1,776 — is outselling it.

Well, give Frey credit, at least he admitted he made it up. Roberts still hasn’t apologized for her destruction of a bunch of college kids and she won’t apologize for this dreadful bit of fiction.

2) Watched the American Hockey League Calder Cup final game between the Manitoba Moose and Hershey Bears on Tuesday night.

In the third period, the Bears dod not complete a single pass. That’s right, not one pass reached its target without bouncing off another player.

How did the Moose lose three games to these guys?

3) My new hero is Judge Redfield T. Baum. He became my hero with just one comment in that Phoenix courtroom on Tuesday. He told the lawyers for commissioner Gary Bettman and the NHL:

“Don’t tell me that you have ‘expressions of interest.’ It’s obvious to me that there is only one bidder, Mr. Balsillie. Expressions of interest are meaningless.”

The Canadian Press was quite impressed as well: “He (Baum) essentially dismissed the NHL’s assertions of four expressions of interest from potential buyers interested in operating the Coyotes in Phoenix — including Toronto Argonauts owners Howard Sokolowski and David Cynamon, and Chicago White Sox and Bulls owner Jerry Reinsdorf — as little more than hearsay. He added there was only one real offer, that of Balsillie.”

Evidently, Baum has a built-in Bullshit Meter and because he has it, the NHL is in for tough ride.

Selena Roberts joins a growing list of “Let’s Make it All Up,” mainstream media superstars

In this space, we have long railed about the mainstream media mess that was the Duke Lacrosse Case. For those who have forgotten, the Duke Lacrosse Case was a tragic miscarriage of justice fueled and then perpetuated by the mainstream media — particularly the New York Times. In this sad story, an ambitious North Carolina prosecutor named Michael Nifong, railroaded a number of Duke University lacrosse players, by using his pals in the mainstream media to convict the kids long before the charges ever got to trial. He and the media, essentially destroyed their lives.

Of course, the case unravelled, the media looked like a foolish, ignorant mob and Nifong lost his job and his license to practice law.

In the middle of it all was a woman named Selena Roberts who, from her bully pulpit at the New York Times, convicted the young men long before any of the false charges ever reached a court of law. Roberts looked like a hateful, mindless idiot when the smoke cleared, but she never did apologize to the young men, whose lives she personally destroyed, or even to the public, which was duped into believing Nifong was right, the kids were monsters and the hooker at the heart of the phony charges was some saint sent to clean up the mess left by men.

There is a deep, dark, white-hot hole in hell for people like Selena Roberts, but like so many mainstream media monsters before her, she can’t quit spewing the fictional venom. 

Now, she’s decided to destroy the life of baseball player Alex Rodriguez and she’s done a pretty damn good job, too. In a book entitled “A-Rod,” this entitled journalist (how does a hate-filled hack like Roberts get jobs at the New York Times and Sports Illustrated?), Roberts has used more than 115 un-named sources to make Rodriguez look like the worst human being ever to play baseball.

Like her scummy predecessors, Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Wlliams, who wrote the books Game of Shadows using more than 225 un-named sources, in their very successful effort to vilify Barry Bonds, Roberts appears to make it all up.

I don’t see any other way to phrase it. When you use that many un-named sources, the only thing you can call it is fiction. Like Fainaru-Wada and Williams, who created a novel so gripping it forced the United States justice department to make up charges against Bonds — charges that have hung in the air for years and have still not resulted in a trial — you’ve done a remarkable job. It was so good, in fact, that Fainaru-Wada got a high-paying job with ESPN as a reward.

Obviously, there is a real benefit to writing fiction and the passing it off as fact. Selena Roberts is the latest mainstream media darling to go down that road and be rewarded for it. I don’t get it, when I wrote my two books, Home Run: The History of the Winnipeg Goldeyes and Canwest Global Park (2005) and the Canadian bestseller, The Winnipeg Jets: A Celebration of Professional Hockey in Winnipeg (2007), my editor wanted nothing less than every quote to be attributed along with dates, times and places, in order to source them all. I guess, when you’re a mainstream media star you can make up quotes and American editors will just blow them off as “un-named sources.”

Fortunately, the American mainstream media, embarrassed by Roberts’ incredible gall, has answered back:

Jason Whitlock of the Kansas City Star wrote on May 2:

Not long ago, sports writer Selena Roberts compared the Duke lacrosse players to gang members and career criminals

She claimed that the players’ unwillingness to confess to or snitch about a rape (that did not happen) was the equivalent of drug dealers and gang members promoting antisnitching campaigns.

When since-disgraced district attorney Mike Nifong whipped up a media posse to rain justice on the drunken, male college students, Roberts jumped on the fastest, most influential horse, using her New York Times column to convict the players and the culture of privilege that created them.

Proven inaccurate, Roberts never wrote a retraction for the columns that contributed to the public lynching of Reade Seligmann, Colin Finnerty and David Evans.

Instead, she moved on to Sports Illustrated, a seat on ESPN’s “The Sports Reporters” and a new target, baseball slugger Alex Rodriguez…

Roberts’ book [about A-Rod] is a long-winded blog. Why it’s being treated as an unimpeachable piece of journalism can only be explained by the cushy position she’s been handed by the New York Times, ESPN and Sports Illustrated and the unchallenged institutional bias found within the elite sports media institutions.

Then, a day or two later, Josh Alper wrote on nbcnewyork.com:

Matt Lauer of “Today” didn’t touch on Roberts’ role in that miserable moment in rushing to judgment (on the Duke lacrosse players) on Monday morning, but he did ask her about the use of anonymous sources, especially if any of them might be telling tall tales to fulfill their own motivations of seeing Rodriguez taken down a peg. Roberts’ response is curious, to say the least.

“But I think there’s not so much jealously as disillusionment because he’s so great, he’s such a great player, he didn’t need any of this,” Roberts told Lauer. ”He didn’t need to embellish anything, he’s a great story in and of himself.”

If, as Roberts’ book alleges, Rodriguez was doing steroids in high school, how is it true that he didn’t need any of this? According to Roberts, he wasn’t embellishing anything. Rather, he was maintaining the steroid use that he started well before stepping foot on a big league diamond. Unless his sixth-grade Little League season was so good that he could have been in the majors right then and there, it is Roberts’ contention that he was never a great player because he was always taking steroids.

And a great story? That’s not evident in what’s been leaked from her book. Stories about A-Rod tipping pitches for the opposition or forcing clubhouse attendants to put toothpaste on his toothbrush are meant to make judgments about Rodriguez’s character. Judgments that all flow from the fact that he used steroids, something that Craig Calcaterra, who hit on Roberts’ Duke connections before Whitlock, quite rightly calls bogus

Those stories, all anonymously sourced, are being roundly rejected by A-Rod’s teammates. Those denials are from Doug Mientkiewicz and Michael Young, which we know because they were willing to put their name behind their words.

As Roberts told Lauer, her use of anonymous sources broke the report of A-Rod’s failed drug test. Every word she writes may be true, but it certainly appears that she’s just as interested in using them to judge A-Rod as a person as she is in finding out if he broke any laws or rules of baseball.  

Selena Roberts’ book on Rodriguez, just like the Bonds’ book before that, is sleazy and yellow and all too typical. Sadly — and Jason Whitlock, among others, know it’s sad — the princes and princesses of the mainstream media milk their hateful, sick fiction for all it’s worth.

Thinkin’ baseball… Koskie calls it quits. World Baseball Classic still great to watch. Can the Blue Jays lose 120 games? Who is Stephen Strasburg?

ORLANDO — Four more things rattling around in my cranium…

1) My friend Corey Koskie officially hung ‘em up on Saturday. No wonder.

 

After spending last Sunday in hospital getting treatment for his 6-year-old son Joshua, who had hit his head and suffered a concussion, Koskie was reminded of his own 2 1/2 years in a fog.

 

So on Saturday, three days after he pulled himself from a game complaining of lightheadedness, Koskie decided to call it quits.

 

“The risks just outweigh the rewards,” Koskie told me, not long after he ended his comeback attempt with the Chicago Cubs. “The way I felt on Wednesday, well, it just wasn’t worth it.”

Koskie, 35, dove for for a ground ball in a spring training game in Arizona on Wednesday and said “I felt really weird.” He knew, at that moment, that he couldn’t play big league baseball again.

“I kind of decided, do I really want to be looking over my shoulder and asking, ‘How do I feel? Is it OK?’ after every single play,” Koskie said. “After everything I’ve gone through over the past 2 1/2 years, I know I don’t want to go back into the fog again.”

Koskie finished his career as Manitoba’s greatest baseball player (no, Russell Ford was not really a Manitoban, but a Minnesotan), a .275 lifetime hitter with 124 home runs. His best year came with the Minnesota Twins in 2001 when he hit 26 homers, stole 27 bases and drove in 103 runs and became the first third baseman in baseball history to hit at least 25 homers, steal 25 bases and drive in 100 runs in one season. 

Officially, the record will say, his career ended as a member of the Milwaukee Brewers on July 5, 2006, when he fell backward and suffered a concussion while trying to catch a pop fly off the bat of Felipe Lopez.

2) I’ve watched every World Baseball Classic game that I can watch and I’ve loved every minute of it. This is a great event and should be played every two years, not every four as planned.

As a Canadian, nothing beats international sport, and this event has been so much fun to watch. It’s simply great to be watching baseball in March and have it mean something.

For me, spring training has lost its edge. To pay up to $40 to watch a Grapefruit League game in which the best players play no more than three innings is simply a rip-off. If you’re a fan of one particular team and you want to watch Single A players who could not make the Goldeyes but might make your favourite team someday, then spring training is for you. But frankly, I’ll take the World Baseball Classic every time.

Granted, it’s an event the mainstream media hates because the mainstream media hates being in Florida on the company’s ticket watching Single A players at spring training who won’t make the big team for five more years. And the mainstream media members who aren’t in Florida just like to follow the mob and rip things they know nothing about. It’s a bad habit, but like Barry Bonds, the hypocritical steroid issue and the Duke Lacrosse case, it’s something we’ve learned to live with.

Frankly, nothing beats a great international tournament at a time when baseball is charging $25-$40 a ticket to watch freakin’ practice.

Long live the WBC.

3) Here in sunny Florida, the outlook for the Toronto Blue Jays is not so sunny.

Insiders say that after Roy Halladay, the Jays have marginal pitching, at best, and the team’s hitting simply won’t be good enough to score the seven or eight runs a game they’ll need to win more often than they lose.

In fact, one highly respected seamhead down here in Florida has suggested that the Jays could lose 120 games this season.

Do you think that will get J.P. Ricciardi fired?

4) Remember the name Stephen Strasburg. Most major league scouts believe Strasburg will be, and I’m quoting here, “The greatest pitcher in baseball history.”

There are even seamheads here in Florida this spring who are drafting Strasburg in Fantasy Keeper Pools because they believe he is going to be great for a long, long time.

Strasburg is a junior at San Diego State who is 6-foot-4, 220-pounds and is the No. 1-ranked player in the upcoming Major League draft. He played on the 2008 U.S. Olympic team and is already called “flawless.” He has a 102-mile-per-hour fastball and an almost unhittable 80-mile-per-hour 12-6 hammer curveball  that he often throws after setting up a hitter with two straight unhittable fastballs. 

This season he is 10-0 at SDSU with 75 strikeouts in 34.1 innings, He has an 8-1 strikeout-walk ratio.

The last-place (2008) Washington Nationals have won the Strasburg Sweepstakes. If the kid stays healthy, he will be the next great big league ace.   

NHL GMs Spend Hours Talking About Fighting in the NHL. Newspapers dying faster than we thought.

TAMPA — I love all the angst over the National Hockey League’s fighting issue for a number of reasons. 

 

Those reasons include, but aren’t limited to, the old mainstream media’s attempt to deal with the issue on a “Letters to the Editor” basis. You know what that looks like: “Our readers have had it with fighting,” the headlines blare. 

 

Yeah, sure they have. The people who write letters to the editor are generally the people who haven’t paid for a hockey ticket in more than a decade. These are the people who haven’t watched a game and haven’t even looked at the standings since the Jets left Winnipeg. Of course they have an opinion on fighting.

 

It’s like that donkey host of The Reporters on ESPN (his name escapes me). He hasn’t paid any attention to hockey since the day Versus got the U.S. rights to live telecasts, but he sure had an opinion about fighting in the NHL on Sunday. He couldn’t tell the difference between a hockey puck and a curling stone but that didn’t deter him from telling the rest of us what’s best for the NHL. He’s a typical New York TV commentator and he’s the biggest problem the NHL has. That’s because he’s the guy the New York-based NHL is trying to tailor its game toward: A guy who has never been to an NHL game and will never go.

 

Fact: No hockey fan has ever left an arena when the fight started. 

 

Sure, it’s possible to find a way to get fighting out of the game, but why in heaven’s name would we want to do that?

 

One simply has to look at the numbers, to see why the general managers spent so much time discussing fighting at their winter meetings in Naples, Fla., last week. Coming out of the lockout, in 2005-06, there were fewer fights in the NHL than at any time in the previous 30 years. Then a year later, the Anaheim Ducks took part in the highest number of fights in the game and they won the Cup. Now, fights are growing at a pace not seen since the late 1980s when teams (in 1987-88) averaged 2.1 fights per game. 

 

Obviously, if games are called tightly and the officials stop allowing the weasels (not the goons, the weasels) to skate around elbowing people in the head (Todd Fedoruk, Darcy Tucker, Steve Ott, the old Sean Avery), then fights won’t be as necessary as they are today.

 

But because the media (and a few fans) whined about all the power-plays during that “New NHL” season (the one after the lockout), the league obviously told the officials to stop calling it so closely. With that, the weasels took over the game and the only way to stop the weasels is to send the goons out after ‘em.

 

The NHL could stop fighting with the same rule change instituted by college hockey: Fight and you’re suspended. But why take fighting out of the game when the fighters do more to maintain control than the officials? 

 

And also, despite all the stupid polls, dimwitted New York TV commentators and letter-writing campaigns, fighting sells tickets.

 

* * *

 

THE SLOW DEATH OF AN ICON 

 

ORLANDO — Along with the news that FP Newspapers Limited Partnership (publishers of the Winnipeg Free Press, the Brandon Sun and the Canstar papers) lost $500,000 in the fourth quarter of 2008 after making $4.6 million in 2007, comes word that more and more American newspapers are going under.

 

The San Francisco Chronicle and Seattle Post-Intelligencer could go  down any day. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune and Chicago Tribune are in bankruptcy protection. The Rocky Mountain News has ceased to publish.

 

The death of printed newspapers will be a slow death, but it will still be a death. Sadly, the people who ran the business in the 90s and early 2000s didn’t see it coming. They were either dishonest (that would cover the ones I worked for), ignorant or just plain unaware. Newspapers have been treading water for years and now they’re about to sink. It’s sad, but inevitable. When the vast majority of your readers are over 60, death is as certain as taxes.

 

On Saturday in Lakeland, as the Detroit Tigers played host to the Toronto Blue Jays at Joker Marchant Stadium, the press box was about half full. There was a time when you couldn’t get a seat in the press box at Joker Marchant, especially if the Blue Jays were in town, but fewer and fewer sports journalists are traveling to spring training these days — mainly because there are fewer and fewer sports journalists around — so if you have a spring training media pass this year, you can sit anywhere you want. 

 

After Saturday’s game (a game that was pretty dull considering that the Blue Jays didn’t bring any big names to Lakeland while the five best Tigers are playing in the World Baseball Classic), we got back to the hotel in Orlando and as I stopped to get a coffee at the Starbucks in the lobby, I noticed that the old Orlando Sentinel racks were filled with scarves, on display with a hand-written note on top,  telling prospective buyers that the scarves were 30 per cent off. 

 

Like so many papers, the Sentinel no longer fills the hotel racks outside downtown Orlando. Way out here in Lake Buena Vista, the hotel gives away internet access, as well as about five different ESPNs, and as a result the newspaper has become obsolete.

 

There is simply no need to read the sports page anymore. Almost all the news in it has already been telecast on ESPN (TSN in Canada) — more than 12 hours earlier — and anything else a reader would need, is on the internet, often days in advance.

 

Daily newspapers got old, tired, dull and pretentious. News was replaced with inanity. A newspaper mob formed and that led to horrible journalistic decisions such as the U.S. rush to war in Iraq, the Duke lacrosse case and the Barry Bonds witch hunt. Most of the people who wrote about these issues had no first hand knowledge of any of it, but they kept plugging away at it anyway. 

 

Small, local magazines and weekly or bi-weekly niche newspapers will survive and prosper. Big dailies with huge buildings, hundreds of employees, fleets of cars and trucks and overpaid editors are just about toast.

 

It’s sad, but in recent years, all newspapers have been able to do well is hurt people. That’s another reason why there won’t be that many people missing newspaper when they go.  

 

In the meantime, someone still has to figure out a way to turn a profit off an internet information site. If that ever happens, the recession will be over.

Bang, bang, bang: Three more little thoughts banging around in my cranium.

Ran 10-K this morning. Spent the 65 minutes listening to Kings of Leon, Airborne Toxic Event, AC/DC and Coldplay on the iPod while thinking about the insanity of the sports world….  

 

1) Great news yesterday for my good friends who are die-hard fans of the Minnesota Vikings. There is no longer any fear that Brett Favre will be at the helm of the Vikings next season. Tarvaris Jackson just might end up being the guy. That is good news. Honest.

 

Thursday it became official. 39-year-old Brett Favre told the New York Jets that he was retiring after 18 seasons, ending a record-setting career in which he became one of the NFL’s all-time greatest players.

Favre made his decision about a month and a half after his one and only year with what Billy Clyde Puckett called, “the dog-ass Jets.” He should have played in Minnesota in 2008, but stuff happens. 

 

Of course, who relly knows about Favre, other than Favre. So, check back later in case he changes his mind – again.

 

2) Philadelphia Phantoms head coach John Paddock, the one-time coach and GM of the Winnipeg Jets, has little good to say about Ottawa Senators GM Bryan Murray. And the fact is, everything ol’ “Too Tall” says is right. 

 

On Thursday, Paddock told the Camden Courier-Post: “We were 14 games over .500 when I was fired. They’re seven under now. Somebody needs to take responsibility for that.” 

Earlier this month, Murray fired his personal choice for head coach in 2008-09, Craig Hartsburg, just 48 games into the season after the Senators bungled off to a record of 17-24-7. 

Paddock, who obviously doesn’t think much of Murray, believes just as former GM John Muckler believes: That the Sens GM has absolutely no clue and should be sent packing.

3) Hank Aaron has told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that he believes Barry Bonds should keep major league baseball’s home run record.

 

“I just don’t see how you really can do a thing like that and just say somebody isn’t the record holder anymore, and let’s go back to the way that it was,” Aaron told the paper of record in Atlanta.

He’s right, too.

Aaron, a class act who hit 755 home runs in his career to break the previous mark of 714 by Babe Ruth, is smart enough to know that even if Bonds took ‘roids, he was far from the only one (by the way, whatever happened to the list of 104 that included Alex Rodriguez? Why was Rodriguez the only player blistered by the mainstream media?). Bonds, of course, surpassed Aaron in 2007 and apparently has ended his career with 762 bombs.

Bonds has pleaded not guilty to charges that, in 2003, he lied to a grand jury when he said he never “knowingly” used steroids (the media likes to say “performance-enhancing drugs,” but the question Bonds was asked reads: “Did you ever take steroids?” After all, in the right circumstance, an aspirin is a performance-enhancing drug). 

However, even if Bonds is acquitted or this mainstream media witch-hunt never gets to trial, he’s already been convicted in the court of public opinion. The two frauds who wrote “Game of Shadows,” the book about Bonds and drugs that included more than 200 unnamed sources (which means they made it all up), along with the rest of the MSM (many of its mob, carving Bonds in print even though they’ve never met the man), have made it impossible for Bonds to ever be acquitted by the public. He’s toast. 

Of course, the worlds dumbest man, baseball commissioner Bud Selig, had recently remarked — out loud, no less — that he, “was considering recognizing Aaron’s total of 755 as the major-league record.”

Sadly, if Selig was any more ignorant, they’d have to put him a home. 

Marvin Miller: The voice of Baseball and — perhaps — even Social Reason.

Marvin Miller, the 91-year-old co-founder of the Major League Baseball Players Association, agreed to speak to ESPN’s Peter Gammons on Tuesday. The interview can be found at espn.com.

 

In the interview, Miller makes some strong comments about the mainstream media-U.S. government steroids witch-hunt. Since both institutions are working together to destroy players’ lives, Miller thought it timely to speak out. His comments are at the bottom of this item.

 

In the meantime, in the summer of 2008, I wrote the following for Grassroots News:

 

By Scott Taylor

Sports Editor

 

As Roger Clemens continues to defend himself against allegations of steroid and Human Growth Hormone use and as the mainstream media mob continues to drone on about “Drug cheats,” and “Juicers,” Grassroots News publisher Arnold Asham asked the following rhetorical questions the other day.

 

“What’s wrong with professional athletes using steroids? And who cares if they do?”

 

The questions are brilliant in their simplicity and I must admit, I’ve had a lot of trouble trying to come up with an honest, moral and ethical answer to either query. 

 

Let’s start with Question 2: “Who cares if they do?” Evidently nobody. You can’t buy a decent Detroit Tigers ticket (for Grapefruit League or the regular-season schedule) even though three Tigers’ stars — Gary Sheffield, Magglio Ordonez and Ivan Rodriguez — have been linked to steroid use.

 

Now, on to Question 1: “What’s wrong with professional athletes using steroids?” Let me tell you, I’ve heard all the arguments:

 

“Steroids are bad for you.”

 

“Using performance enhancing drugs is cheating.”

 

“It’s not a level playing field if you use steroids.”

 

OK, but why? No one, not even the king of drug cops, the World Anti-Doping Agency’s former chair Dick Pound has ever been able to answer that question. Pound and his followers have created the bad rap, but they’ve never once given a clear indication as to why steroids are bad.

In November of 2005 in the publication “Virtual Mentor,” the American Medical Association’s Journal of Ethics, Dr. Norman Fost, director of the Program in Medical Ethics at the University of Wisconsin, wrote an article entitled “Steroid Hysteria: Unpacking the Claims.”

He answered the questions Pound and the mainstream media horde have never answered. Although, I would doubt neither Pound nor the mainstream media would have appreciated or agreed with his answers.

“The long campaign to demonize and prohibit the use of anabolic steroids in sports—in the press, by the United States Congress, and by the offices of the leaders of sports—has been so strident and one-sided that a literate person would have little reason to suspect there is another side to the story,” Dr. Fost wrote. “But it is the business of ethics to present justifications for actions, and the claims that have been made for prohibiting the use of anabolic steroids by competent adults appear to be incoherent, disingenuous, hypocritical, and based on bad facts.”

The worst excuse is the one that suggests that because of steroids the playing field is not level and competition is unfair. That would be true, one supposes, if performance-enhancing drugs were not easily available and if big league athletes didn’t make enough money to pay for them. And these are the same big league athletes who often legal take cortisone shots to play while injured, eat legal painkillers “like Skittles” as Clemens claimed, and make regular use of the legal muscle-building supplement, Creatine.

Fact: There is no level playing field. How many people were given LeBron James’s physical gifts? Genetics guarantees that at birth, the playing field is not level.

However, according to Fost, “Competition can be unfair if there is unequal access to such enhancements, but equal access can be achieved more predictably by deregulation than by prohibition. It is hypocritical for leaders in Major League Baseball to trumpet their concern about fair competition in a league that allows one team (the Yankees) to have a payroll three times larger than most of its competitors.”

For years, we’ve heard the argument that taking steroids causes acne on the back, a large, square forehead, loss of hair, shrinking of testicles and, eventually, an early death. As an ethicist, those claims confuse Fost. 

“Good ethics starts with good facts, and the claims on this point are, to understate the case, seriously overstated,” he wrote. “Articles abound in the mass media on the life-threatening risks of anabolic steroids: cancer, heart disease, stroke, and so on. What is missing are peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals to support the claims.”

Fost loves to site the case of former Oakland Raiders linebacker Lyle Alzado. According to Fost: “So Lyle Alzado, the NFL all-star, is presented on the front page of the New York Times and the cover of Sports Illustrated because of an alleged steroid-related brain tumor. What is missing is a single article, or evidence, or even a quote from any authority on the topic to support any connection between steroids and Alzado’s tumor.”

Another argument that appears to make Fost laugh in disgust is the one that suggests anabolics are unnatural and “undermine the essence of sport.”

“This claim seems predicated on the notion that there is some essence of sport. Oh, spare me,” Fost says. “Sports are games, invented by humans, with arbitrary rules that are constantly changing. Since the beginning of recorded history, athletes have used an infinite variety of unnatural assists to enhance performance, from springy shoes to greasy swimsuits, bamboo poles to better bats, and endless chemicals from carb-filled diets to Gatorade drinks. Why is there not a ban on training in high altitudes, or sleeping in a hypobaric chamber, for the purpose of raising hemoglobin to unnatural levels?”

Here’s another one that gives our University of Wisconsin ethicist indigestion: “Steroids undermine the integrity of sports records.”

“Of all the proposed punishments for Rafael Palmeiro, the Baltimore Orioles slugger who was reported to have tested positive for steroids, the favorite seemed to be to abolish his home run records,” Fost recalled. “The implicit concern is that Babe Ruth or Roger Maris is being unfairly deprived of his place in history. But steroids are only one of many reasons why the old records keep falling. The fences are shorter, the pitching mound is lower, the ball is livelier, the strike zone keeps changing, and so on. The left field fence in Jacobs Field is more than 100 feet closer than it was in (Cleveland’s) Municipal Stadium when it opened in the 1930s, so let’s have some asterisks for home runs at The Jake and every other stadium with shortened fences.”

Everyone will agree that kids shouldn’t use steroids. Kids shouldn’t use any drugs at all, frankly.

 

And don’t forget, scientific study provides clear proof that tobacco and beverage alcohol are much worse for you – athlete or non-athlete – than steroids will ever be. Just ask former NHL all-star defenceman Rob Ramage who is going to jail for four years because he drank too much and drove his car. 

 

Strange but hypocritically true: Beverage alcohol is not only legal, our provincial government advertises it and encourages its use.

 

We live in a drug-centric society. All you have to do is watch the nightly news shows in the United States and you will see one drug advertisement after another. There is now a drug to get it up, take it down, wake up in the morning, go to sleep at night. There are drugs for acid reflux (burping), for restless leg syndrome (whatever) and too much cholesterol (change your diet). Our society now exists on drugs.

 

But as Dr. Fost maintains, the media has decided that the use of anabolic steroids in sport should be illegal. Trouble is, no one has made it very clear as to why. And sadly, that hasn’t happened yet. 

 

Personally, I don’t doubt steroids should be outlawed in sport. I’m not sure our publisher, Mr. Asham, would argue that steroids shouldn’t be outlawed. It’s just that we’d both like someone to give us a good reason why.

 

On Wednesday Jerry Crasnick wrote the following at espn.com. These comments were taking from a 40-minute interview with Marvin Miller conducted by Peter Gammons:   

 

Crasnick set this up by writing: “Miller took several other hard-line and potentially unpopular stands during a 40-minute interview with ESPN.com Tuesday. Among his other observations:”

 

• On the issue of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball: “I have a personal belief that there’s no such thing as a magic pill or magic injection. I don’t know that there’s any scientific evidence that there’s a performance-enhancing drug. Players take it because they think it does. That’s a far cry from saying that it does. Where is the evidence that requires testing?”

 

• On the argument that steroids should be eliminated from the game because of health concerns: “Not one but two surgeons general have said that tobacco use is the worst cause of death in the United States that can be prevented — that we lose 400,000 people a year to tobacco-related incidents and over time it runs into the millions. Yet not only do we not outlaw tobacco, but the U.S. Congress keeps giving subsidies to the tobacco industry and everybody sits back and smiles. On the other hand, there’s not one single documented death from the use of steroids. So that’s a hypocritical lie.”

 

• On the dangers of taking drug test results as gospel: “Anybody who has read about urine testing for a long time knows that quite a number of false positives come up. You get a false positive and then people are questioned in another context — ‘were you a user?’ They say no. And then you get a news leak — a leak of a leak, as it were — and it turns out that you tested positive. If you said something under oath, you could go to jail and still be an innocent person.”

 

• On why the union didn’t necessarily have to bend to the wishes of membership and agree to random drug testing. “I have no doubt that was a factor in the union agreeing to it. But leadership can’t just take a poll on what membership wants. You also have to judge whether this is in the best interests of the people you represent. If the entire membership voted unanimously to disband, would you do it?”

 

• On the media’s role in perpetuating steroid use by referring to the drugs as “performance enhancers”: “A kid who would love to be a professional athlete reads the sports pages or watches ESPN and is told over and over again, ‘These are performance enhancing drugs. They will make you a Barry Bonds or an A-Rod or a Roger Clemens,’ The media, without evidence, keep telling young people all over the country, ‘All you have to do to be a famous athlete with lots of money is take steroids.’ The media are the greatest merchants of encouraging this that I’ve ever seen.”

 

Miller also criticized the Justice Department for engaging in “union-busting tactics” by using the confidentiality provision in the drug testing to get information from players, and said many of the “experts” who advocate for greater testing in sports have an inherent conflict because they run labs and stand to profit.

 

“It’s a witch hunt in baseball, for sure, but it also extends to cycling and the Olympics,” Miller said. “And the victims are the athletes. They’re obviously the ones being hunted down here.” 

 

There are a lot of people who write the truth and know the truth. The trouble is, the mainstream media — a large portion of whom are smokers and drinkers — believe that steroids are bad and are perpetuating what Miller calls “a hypocritical lie.”

 

Again, the biggest problem we face in sports is not steroid use but an ignorant mainstream media reporting falsehoods and perpetuating lies.