Tag Archives: David Asper

Anyone Really Surprised by the Cost of a New Football Stadium.

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. — So David Asper and his real estate development firm, Creswin Properties Ltd., has determined that the cost for a new football stadium in Winnipeg will be about $160 million — give or take.

Does that surprise anyone?

When Asper first presented his proposal to construct a new stadium for the Bombers, the cost was estimated at $115 million. Didn’t sound like much, but everyone assumed Asper had done his homework.

Trouble was, the original stadium plan was presented to the Blue Bombers board in January of 2007. That’s almost four years ago. Times have changed dramatically since then. Did anyone out there think costs would go down over the last four years?

Evidently some people did, proving once again that what you read in newspapers can often be much more surprising than the truth.

Manitoba Premier Greg Selinger said on Friday that would meet with Asper and  Winnipeg Mayor Sam Katz and find out how the increased costs would be covered. Whew?! Selinger didn’t think the costs for a stadium would rise in four years? Ouch.

To his credit, Selinger says he is still committed to a building new stadium for the Bombers simply because the current structure, Canad Inns Stadium, is a 55-year-old dinosaur that provides little or no parking or concession revenue for the club and is cracking at its foundations and along the sides of its second decks. Like Winnipeg’s aging infrastructure, Canad Inns Stadium needs more than a simple overhaul.

Naturally, people will whine about “the taxpayer getting gouged for more money,” but until the taxpayer tells the federal government to stop spending $1 billion per year on the CBC, those complaints ring hollow to me. I’d much sooner pay for a football stadium in my home town than a gargantuan national media company that tends to lean farther to the left than the NDP and far too often replaces facts with opinion.

Under an agreement signed last year, Creswin Properties would pay for most of the project, with the federal and provincial governments coming up with a combined $35 million dollars ($15 million goes directly to the University of Manitoba as its share in the stadium partnership). It’s unlikely Asper or Creswin has the dough to pick up an extra $40 million to $50 million.

Maybe we could call the new building: “NDP Government Stadium.”

Another Week Reading and Listening to… the Wrong Stuff

ORLANDO, Fla. — I’ve just spent a week reading that “Brett Favre had elbow tendonitis and would not play Sunday against Dallas.” Or “Brett Favre doesn’t want to be a distraction and might sit out Sunday’s game.”

It all seemed silly, but big time major media outlets reported it for seven days while fantasy players went crazy.

Of course, anyone who knows anything about Favre knew he was going to play. He might have had a sore arm, but he didn’t agree to return to the Vikings this season and NOT play. Sure, he plays behind the most porous offensive line in the NFL, but Favre has steel cojones and he was going to play. Period.

The media, however, wanted you to believe otherwise.

It’s becoming a disease. The mainstream media wants so badly to control the message — or just get something first — that it has resorted, over the past few years, to just making it up. I guess the new motto is: “Manufactured reporting is as good as real reporting.”

Let’s review another week in Crazyland:

(1) What is it about the New York Yankees? I like the Yanks, frankly. I think Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, Mariano Rivera, Nick Swisher , Mark Teixeira and Curtis Granderson etc. are among the classiest players in baseball.

But I just can’t listen to the TBS/Fox/ESPN announcers for one more minute. Cheerleading works if you’re Ken Harrelson in Chicago, Tom Hamilton in Cleveland, John Sterling in New York etc. You work for the team. I get that. But when you watch a national broadcast and these guys keep cheering for the Yanks, it drives me nuts.

Monday night, I lasted half an inning with the announcers. Then…click. The MUTE button. I would have felt a lot better if these guys would just show their true devotion and go down on the field and ask Andy Pettitte out. Date him, for gawd’s sake. But, please, quit fawning all over him on TV. It’s embarrassing.

(2) You just have to love the latest stadium battle here in Winnipeg. There are some media outlets who want you to believe that the new stadium out at the U of M, is going to cost so much money, it will never be built. Others are suggesting David Asper has been misleading the public for years. Others just don’t want it built at all.

While the local media has absolutely no idea what the final cost will be for the current plans for the stadium, they sure aren’t afraid to tell us that the stadium will turn into a “money pit” or that the taxpayer is going to be on the hook for a lot more than $115 million. That’s confidence, my friends.

Now I have never doubted the stadium would cost more than $115 million and won’t be surprised in the least if it does cost more, but the question that needs to be answered is this: What earthly good does it do anyone to talk about what might be or what could be or what we might imagine it to be and then call it “news?”

As Winnipeggers, we also have to decide if we want a new stadium or if we want the old one to come falling down on top of us. Never forget, the provincial NDP government wants the new stadium built because it knows the old one hasn’t got a lot of life left. It certainly doesn’t have the required amenities to make the Bombers profitable. That’s why it’s prepared to float a loan to Asper to get it started. And it is under construction as we speak.

Recently, I talked to David Asper who, barring a disaster, will soon be the owner of the Blue Bombers, and who says his real estate firm, Creswin Properties, is going through all the tenders and coming to terms with a final cost. He still believes it will be around $115 million.

For its part, Creswin has lost patience with the local media geniuses, many of whom don’t even own a home, but apparently do know what a new stadium will cost.

Monday we should hear word. It will be good for the community to stop all the whining about what MIGHT happen and start whining about what WILL happen.

Because good news or bad, there will still be whining.

Another Week in the Trenches. Atlanta, Parity, Lousy Officiating and Broke Owners.

In a week in which the Stanley Cup playoffs started, Jerry Reinsdorf was given an NHL franchise, Colorado’s Ubaldo Jimenez pitched a no-hitter, the Blue Bombers released one of the team’s best players and HD TV proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that baseball umpires aren’t very good, there was more talk about Atlanta heading to Winnipeg, Ben Roethlisberger’s transgressions and the city’s reluctance to just give David Asper a free pass.

1) The Blue Bombers released Sideeq Shabazz, a fan favourite and clearly one of the best players in the CFL last season.

The Bombers feel they have to get younger and that’s true. Shabazz is 29 and heaven knows, you’re just about done at 29, but more importantly, the Bombers have serious financial problems.

When Brendan Taman was running the team, he signed some contracts with players that he knew he was going to have to pay later.  Last year, the Bombers started the season $460,000 over the cap. In other words, the only way the football club could stay within the $4.2 million Cdn that is the salary management system’s player payroll cap, was to keep costs down and still hope to be able to compete.

When Mike Kelly took over the club, he was in a bind. The team was still paying Kevin Glenn, Charles Roberts and Milt Stegall (among others) and it was going to have to make it on $3.74 million. It didn’t. Not quite anyway. In the end, the Bombers finished $44,000 over the cap and they were penalized.

So now, still in a financial quagmire, still paying former players, the Bombers have to dump as many veterans as they can — within some kind of competitive plan for 2010 — and try to make it with a load of kids. Especially if they intend to pay quarterback Buck Pierce and veterans like Terrance Edwards, Doug Brown and Fred Reid.

It isn’t easy running the Bombers these days. Last year, the club lost $1.2 million on operations. This year, the team still has cap trouble. If the Bombers go 6-12, fans can consider it a successful year.

2) Watched 12 hours of baseball on Saturday. From the Twins and Blue Jays, to the Indians win over Chicago, the Tigers loss to Seattle and seven hours of St. Louis and the Mets, my wife Sally and I also watched the final two innings of Ubaldo Jimenez’s no-hitter against the Braves. There is nothing better than MLB TV live to HD TV through your computer.

Through it all, I spent much of that time yelling at my gigantic, room-dwarfing HD TV. “Can’t anybody call these stining games properly anymore!!?”

In the Cleveland-Chicago game, the first base umpire called Cleveland’s Shin-Soo Choo out on an appeal play for missing first base while he legged out a double. The replay clearly showed that Choo touched the corner of the bag. It was a horrible call and the more I watched the replay, the more I realized that only a blind guy (or someone with a bet on the game) could call Choo out.

As the day went on, there were half a dozen bad calls at second base on attempted steals and even worse, the strike zone is now a moving, living thing that can be deciphered only by the plate umpire at hat exact moment. Players keep saying all they ask for is consistency. That’s just silly. There has never been consistency and there certainly isn’t any today.

Baseball desperately needs replay for every close play and technology should replace the homeplate umpire when it comes to calling balls and strikes.

3)  In Winnipeg, it seems everyone is doing what it takes to make the new football stadium deal feel politically palatable. “Don’t give David Asper too much. Couch it so that taxpayers feel protected. Make sure anyone who criticizes the deal is marginalized. And if you’re a politician, don’t really give anyone the facts of the deal so that you can change it later.”

What no one seems to have grasped is this: Winnipeg needs a new football stadium, the old one is eventually going to fall down, the community-owned football team can’t make money in that old dump and at some point, somebody is going to have to spend some public money on a new building. The longer we wait, the more expensive it gets.

And frankly, I don’t have any trouble with taxpayers’ money being spent on a new football stadium — anywhere in Canada. I have no trouble honouring all the agreements made with Asper and even with the $90 million-plus loan that’s been offered.

That’s because I believe this: As long as $1 billion in federal taxes is GIVEN to the CBC every single year, the rest of the government’s spending is relatively unimportant. I’m forced to pay taxes to give $1 billion every single year to a broadcasting company that leans far to the left (not just left, but stunningly far, far left), refuses to tell the truth on its website even when its asked to make changes based on fact and hires people who turn into pompous, over-bearing Toronto-centric fools who have no concept of how Canadians live. It also sucks advertising money out of the economy and  yet it still can’t balance its books.

Until the federal government stops funding the CBC, I believe they owe Winnipeg a football stadium. In fact, I believe the entire $135 million bill should be paid for by the feds. As long as the CBC exists in its current form, any argument over how federal taxpayers’ money is spent is just silly and distracting.

4) We tend to go on about small crowds and financial losses in non-traditional NHL markets, but who would ever have thought that the Liverpool Football Club of the English Premier League was $500 million US in the glue.

This past week, Liverpool’s American owners formally put the club up for sale, as both Tom Hicks (who also has to sell the NHL’s Dallas Stars in order to pay his debts) and George Gillett Jr. admitted they no longer have the financial resources to improve the team or build a much-needed new stadium.

The fact the Bombers lost $1.2 million on operations last year (a lot of it to pay back former president Lyle Bauer for all the money he deferred over the years in order to keep the books balanced), is a pittance compared to the losses suffered by Liverpool.

When you consider that the operation of the NBA this season will fall $400 million short of break-even, it’s becoming apparent that all major professional sport — not just the shaky NHL and CFL — is in financial trouble. The recession is deeper than people think and it will be interesting to see what happens in the next decade.

5) I love all the talk about the NFL suspending Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Roethlisberger, 28, was not charged with any crime for a night at a college bar with a 20-year-old female. There are all sorts of nasty media stories about Roethlisberger’s behaviour that night. There are all sorts of pundits and commentators who like to call Roethlisberger names and, of course, want him punished.

But as the police and the district attorney’s office have made clear, he broke no laws. It appears that the media, and the media alone, have now admitted to something that many of us have known for a long time. The only thing the mainstream media does well is hurt people and that screaming for punishment, even for people who don’t break laws, is what the American mainstream media does best.

6) Speaking of the mainstream media, I wonder how they responded to Andy Sutton’s elbow to the head of Jordan Leopold on Saturday night. After screaming for months about increasing the severity of penalties to get head shots out of the game, the media watched as Sutton drilled an unprotected Leopold in the head with a vicious elbow on Saturday night.

No penalty was called and I haven’t heard any screaming today. In fact, many mainstream media members I’ve read this morning have called the check “clean.” Ouch.

It’s great to scream and yell about concussions and other injuries, but hockey is a collision sport and if you are going to play it, you sign up for danger. That was a dreadful hit by a man hoping to injure another player, a player who was in a vulnerable position, fighting off a check from one of Sutton’s teammates. However, it was no different than any number of hits in any number of games this year.

Sutton’s physical destruction of Jordan Leopold was a textbook case for creating special head-hunting penalties. But there was no penalty at all on the play and no one seems terribly concerned by that. The message was clear: Quit whining and play.

7) Walking through the Home Depot on Saturday morning, one of the store’s employees approached me and politely asked, “When are the Atlanta Thrashers coming to Winnipeg?”

He’d been at a family gathering and one of his family members happens to work for the Manitoba Moose. That family member said he had been told by Moose brass to prepare for the arrival of the Thrashers and to be ready to move with the AHL team. Perhaps even to Saskatoon.

This is not the first time a hockey fan in Winnipeg has been told this story by someone who seemed honest and sincere. While Moose brass don’t want to admit it, the rumours of the NHL’s return to Winnipeg are being stoked by people who are working at MTS Centre.

The rumours will not go away until someone at the top of the pecking order at True North Sports and Entertainment stands up and says, “The NHL is NOT, ever, returning to Winnipeg.”

Right now, I for one, just can’t escape the talk and frankly, I continue to find it fascinating.

New Bombers Stadium Has City “Insurance?” Well, Sort of but Not Really.

The Winnipeg Free Press broke the new football stadium story this past weekend and on Tuesday, in its follow-up story, the paper wrote the following: “The new (stadium) deal would see the province reduce its commitment, in exchange for providing the financing necessary to build the stadium before The Elms get up and running. The city would act as insurance, should Creswin fail to assemble the retail project.”

Other than the fact the “deal” has no eyes and can’t see anything at all and that there is a comma in the middle of the first sentence that shouldn’t be there, to claim “the city would act as insurance,” is an odd and potentially frightening sentence. How would the city “act as insurance?” Where was this insurance money coming from?

Well, after a conversation with Mayor Sam Katz on Tuesday night,here’s the deal: The province will find the money (loans likely) to start construction on the stadium and, ultimately, David Asper will build a commercial mall that will be used to pay the debt on the stadium. However, if Asper can’t build his commercial development, The Elms, then the city would turn over all the property tax money that the city will receive on the current stadium land to the province to pay back the loans.

In other words, the city doesn’t receive any property tax money on that land today (the Bombers play in the stadium rent and tax free), but if some developer other than Asper purchased the land and built something (anything?) on the land, the tax money the city received for  that land — and that land alone — would go to the province to pay the debts on the new stadium at the U of M.

That seems reasonable. Ultimately, the city would be turning nothing into a new stadium.

I was told last night that Selinger’s new deal should be palatable for most taxpayers and the Premier is correct when he says there is no intelligent reason why more money should be shoveled into the toilet that is Canad Inns Stadium. According to the Premier, it would take $52 million to repair (not refurbish, but “repair”) the current stadium and that’s just throwing good money after bad.

Wednesday’s announcement will be the best news the Bombers have had since 1990. For those who have lost count, that’s the last time the Bombers won a Grey Cup.

If Selinger Says So, Then it Has to Be True

Saturday morning, David Asper woke up to the best news he’s had since the Winnipeg Football Club accepted his proposal to build a new football stadium in Winnipeg way back in January of 2007.

The Winnipeg Free Press reported that Premier Greg Selinger would make an announcement “in days,” guaranteeing that he would “step in to ensure a new home  for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers will be built at the University of Manitoba.”

As the story unfolded it became apparent that no one in Manitoba, including Asper, knew much of this incredible development but it was clear he was going to be the beneficiary of what appeared to be $85 million in provincial government money — $85 million that had not been written into the provincial budget.

But yesterday, Asper didn’t sound too happy.

“I’m not talking about it,” Asper snapped, when asked about the new deal. “Scott, I’m not going to talk about it.”

According to the Free Press, “Sources confirmed late Friday Selinger, Creswin (Properties), the City of Winnipeg, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers and Ottawa are close to hammering out a new deal to build a scaled-down stadium, likely beginning this summer.”

That was news to Winnipeg mayor Sam Katz.

“I don’t know anything about it, nobody’s talked to me” Katz said on Saturday morning. “Right now I have people running around trying to find out what was promised the last few years. I do know that we can’t put any more money into the stadium we have now. The Tower Report, five or six years ago, said we needed about $10 million to improve the current stadium. That’s more than doubled. I won’t spend taxpayers money on that stadium.”

It’s funny, but only a couple of people who would be involved in the deal spoke to the Free Press, and not one of them said they knew anything of Selinger’s plans. However, I certainly believe the story is true. Everybody in town knows that if the provincial NDP government asks the Free Press to write a story, they’ll write it. The FP didn’t earn the nickname, “Official Newspaper of the Provincial NDP Government,” for nothing. This story definitely has legs.

Sadly, in its effort to get a stadium built, we hear that the government wants to scale back the new venue from a $135 million project to a $100 million project. One wonders what we’ll get for $100 million. The University of Minnesota’s TCF Bank Stadium is very nice, but not spectacular and it cost $288 million US. The total capital cost of the MTS Centre was $133.8 million and it’s a scaled down 15,001-seat AHL hockey rink. One wonders how many seats $100 million will buy?

Still, if this story is true, and I certainly believe it is, Selinger is going to give Asper an $85 million gift while the feds give him $15 million. When Asper gets his new mall operating, he’ll get an option to purchase the team. Wow! that IS a new deal. It’s not even close to the agreement the Bombers have with Asper. Not even close.

No wonder Asper wasn’t very happy this morning.

Bauer Resigns, Kelly Fired. David Asper Can’t Arrive Soon Enough.

Full disclosure: Former Winnipeg Blue Bombers head coach Mike Kelly is my friend. He’s been my friend for 20 years. He will still be my friend.

With that said, Kelly’s unceremonious departure from the Winnipeg Blue Bombers on Thursday was not surprising. After a difficult season in which he was forced to rebuild a football team that had been crumbling from within under Doug Berry, and then had to fight a vindictive media that was out to destroy him, Kelly was attacked in his own home by an ex-girlfriend and, as a result, was arrested and charged with assault under Pennsylvania’s strict zero tolerance law.

A man can’t get into a physical altercation with a woman — anyplace, anytime — and regardless of the details, the man will always lose in the court of public opinion. After the arrest, it was only a matter of hours before the Blue Bombers Board of Directors fired Kelly. They really had no other choice.

I spoke to Mike on Friday and, not surprisingly, he wasn’t talking. When legal is involved, there isn’t much one can say.

Still, the events of Thursday were quite interesting. In case you’ve forgotten, CEO Lyle Bauer resigned and head coach Kelly was fired. The circus of news conferences, complete with festering piles of bullshit you could actually measure with a thermometer, brought two things into focus:

(1) If you are the Winnipeg Blue Bombers, you don’t ever argue — even discuss — the delivery of your message with the mainstream media. In Winnipeg, the media will control the Bombers’ message, not the Bombers.

(2) Despite the existence of the Bombers board and despite Lyle Bauer’s presence as CEO for the past decade, the Bombers are run by the local mainstream media. If the mainstream Winnipeg media wants something, the Bombers will roll over and give it to them. That might account for the fact the team hasn’t won a championship in 19 years.

When you turn the operation of a sports franchise over to people who have never worked a day in the front office of a sports franchise, you’ll have problems. When you turn a football franchise over to people who have never played a game of touch, let alone tackle football, you will be a disaster.

In Winnipeg, the Bombers fear of the media has proved to be their undoing. This year, that was made quite clear.

When Kelly suggested that it was time to become professional with the dissemination of information, he was actually reprimanded by his boss.

Kelly’s plan was to handle the media the way the National Football League handles the media. Say the team plays on a Friday night. Kelly would speak to the media on Thursday and Friday morning, then after the game on Friday and then again on Saturday. On Sunday, the offensive co-ordinator (or the No. 1 offensive coach) would speak to the media and then, on Monday, it would be the defensive co-ordinator. On Tuesday and Wednesday, assistant coaches would get the floor and then it would come around to Kelly again.

When certain members of the local media got wind of that, they were all over Bauer. It was Kelly every day or nothing. Bauer, of course, relented, and Kelly was thrust into that tiny, smelly stairwell outside the media bunker every day. For the Bombers, it was another dumb decision in a season of dumb decisions.

So when people wonder, “Why didn’t Kelly just shut up?” the answer was, he tried but he wasn’t permitted.

Kelly also wanted to move the daily news conference out of that claustrophobic stairwell and into the Sun Centre (frankly, all Bomber media information should be disseminated in the Sun Centre), but he wasn’t permitted to do that either. Seems the Bombers couldn’t afford to keep the Sun Centre clean.

Unlike an NFL franchise which has a vice-president of communications who not only has equal authority with the head coach, but is regarded so highly by his employers that he/she is at an equal pay grade with the head coach, the Bombers’ communications people have always been little more than back-room peons who make small paycheques and send out press releases. Kelly received no direction, got no help and had no filter because there was no one in the organization with the responsiblity or the authority to make sure the message was not only controlled, but delivered in such a manner that the local mainstream media felt sufficiently appeased.

Meanwhile, Kelly wanted to control television’s access to his practice time. He decided early on to give the TV stations specific times to record. It’s been done in the NFL for two decades and Kelly just wanted to feel more comfortable about TV’s ability to record what he was doing at practice (Not that a TV anchor would have any what’s on tape, but what an opposing football coach might do if he saw something odd. Kelly had no fear of the media. He knew they had no clue). Simple request.

Trouble was, the team’s communications peon didn’t bother to send out the schedule until, oh, AFTER, the first practice of training camp. Global’s Joe Pascucci went nuts when he was told he couldn’t record most of the first practice and Kelly was left to accept responsibility for a communications department that either didn’t do its job or was told, at a higher level, not to do it.

There were dozens of other incidents. Kelly was not going to be allowed to control his own message and not only was the local mainstream media not going to allow him to do it, but apparently neither were certain members of the Bombers front office.

2009 was a Gong Show in Bomberland. In the end, the Bombers board got a rebuilt team (yes, yes, the Bombers still need a quarterback) without a leader off the field, without a leader on the field and without a decent place to play.

However, that’s no problem for this Bomber board and their pals in the mainstream media, the folks who have created this little problem. After all, we’ve already been handed a list of acceptable CEO and coaching candidates by the local press and one of the names of the coaching list is Paul LaPolice. Yep, that’s the same Paul LaPolice that the local media called “incompetent” when he ran the Bombers offence in 2002 and 2003 (even though he put up huge passing numbers in 2002). That’s the same guy they ran out of town on a rail.

In Winnipeg, there are two professional sports franchises that are privately owned. The baseball Goldeyes, 2009 Organization of the Year in the Northern League and the hockey Moose, 2009 American Hockey League President’s Trophy winners. Both franchises are beautifully operated and both play in gorgeous venues. It became painfully obvious this week that private ownership is the only way for the Bombers to go.

In fact, what happened on Thursday — as a result of what happened throughout in 2009 — was proof that David Asper’s arrival as a private, accountable franchise owner can’t occur soon enough. Fear has reigned on Maroons Road for far too long. It’s time to bring the Bombers into the 21st Century.

No Wonder Newspapers Are Dying

MINNEAPOLIS — Friday night, we spent a terrific night at the Metrodome in Minneapolis watching the Minnesota Twins turn the American League Central Division race into a real race.

The Twins got a tremendous pitching performance from Brian Duensing, a two-run bomb from Michael Cuddyer and held on in the ninth to shut out the Detroit Tigers 3-0. Great game, great night at the ballpark. And it was nice to have a brief chat with my old friends Larry Fitzgerald Sr. and Chuck Olsen in the press box.

But then, what happens in the cold light of dawn? The Twin Cities Star-Tribune newspaper arrives at my door (it was part of my hotel stay, I can assure you I wouldn’t pay for it) and I read the column by Jim Souhan.

Nice premise: “On their feet, fans grasp the worth of important baseball.” Souhan defended the American League Central Division, the Division that every baseball fan will agree is the weakest of them all, but he did it with a moronic, backhanded shot at the Division that showed his incredible ignorance. The ignorance only possessed by an unthinking mainstream media newspaper columnist in these days of the dying daily newspaper.

Souhan wrote: “Baseball needs a place to hide its weaker teams and the Northern League is full.”

Whether Souhan failed to have the proper size of cojones to rip the American Association where the Twin Cities’ own St. Paul Saints play or he was just rushing at deadline, is not for me to decide. But the truth is this. The Northern League is NOT full and it would gladly accept the American League Central Division’s Cleveland Indians and Kansas City Royals.

Check the roster in Cleveland. This year’s September call-up edition of the Cleveland Indians is not as good as the Fargo-Moorhead RedHawks. And frankly, that lousy Class A team is being passed off as a Major League ball club. That’s nothing short of fraud.

But what the hell? Just as columnists make up phony plans for football stadiums (there is NO Plan B if David Asper fails) and others create hockey trades out of the ether, we’ve grown to accept pure, unadulterated mendacity in the mainstream media. I keep kicking myself every day, saying: “Why do I bother to read that stuff?”

No wonder newspapers are dying.

New Football Stadium in Winnipeg a Good Deal All Around

The Winnipeg Blue Bombers will get a new owner in 2010 and a new stadium in 2011.

It’s probably the two best things that could happen to the franchise.

 

The Bombers are a proud franchise that continues to lose money and continues to lose football games. Although the team went to the Grey Cup in 1992, 1993, 2001 and 2007, the Bombers have not won a Grey Cup championship since 1990. Frankly, in an eight-team league, every team should win at least one championship in 18 years just by dumb luck.

 

There is no dumb luck in Winnipeg. Just when it looks like this team has the horses and is red-hot at the right something like, oh, a starting quarterback’s broken arm douses the flame.

 

In the meantime, the 55-year-old stadium, located in the centre of a commercial district in the west end of town, has become more of an eyesore than a destination. The most popular aspect of Canada Inns Stadium is the Appleton’s Rum Shack. In fact, it’s often more popular than the team. 

 

So when media baron and property developer David Asper came forward 14 months ago with an idea to build a new stadium and take over ownership — and fiscal responsibility — from the community board that has run the team for almost 80 years, it seemed like the right thing to do.

 

Still, Asper has spent the last 14 months doing everything possible to sell his idea to the community. He’s run an interactive web site, www.blueandgold.ca; he’s held open forums, both public and with special interest groups; and he’s acquiesced to the demands of federal, provincial and civic politicians. 

 

He has done everything in good faith.

 

But at the news conference on Wednesday to announce the deal, the new members of the old media (we’re not talking about the veteran reporters such as the Free Press’ s Randy Turner and Ed Tait, the Sun’s Kirk Penton, Global’s Joe Pascucci or CJOB’s Bob Irving, but this group of children who don’t Google and don’t read the printed material that’s handed out) gave a virtuoso performance of ignorance and attempts at, well, hubris.

 

It started when a young child from CBC television opened with a question impugning Asper about his business acumen. She suggested that because the family business, Canwest Communications was struggling, Asper himself was somehow going to go broke and default on his responsibilities.

 

Now I would not have thought anything of that question coming from, say CJOB, a Corus radio station that is and always has done quite well financially, but for CBC to send out its child reporter to suggest that Asper, who is using his own money (not Canwest’s money) to build the stadium, would soon go broke and we’d have a helluva mess is patently outrageous.

 

This, from a taxpayer-funded operation that has outlived its usefulness and contributed mightily to the recent problems faced by the Asper family and by the country’s other major television network, CTV. The CBC receives $1 billion a year from the federal government — one freakin’ BILLION, not million, BILLION — and can sell TV advertising on top of that and yet it still can’t balance its books. Instead, after losing $171 million in 2008, it went back to the feds asking for something called a “bridge loan.” Bridge to what? The CBC was never going to actually pay back the $171 million. They were looking for another handout.  

 

This time the feds said, “Not a chance, you boobs,” and so last week, the public broadcaster announced 800 layoffs. 

 

Still, despite all of its own incompetence, some CBC news producer sent out a little girl with an attitude to suggest Asper was somehow going to fail miserably. Had she only bothered to use Google, she might have learned that Creswin Properties and Canwest Communications are two different companies run by two different people. Leonard Asper is not involved in this deal.

 

Stunning.

 

From that point on, the news conference was loaded with questions that were already answered on the printed handout that was given to every media member when he or she entered the room. 

 

Sad, but true. And the mainstream media is wondering why its days are numbered.

 

Here are the facts. The deal is tremendous. Asper pays $100 million out of his own pocket to build the stadium and take over the team. No other person on the planet — no one, nobody, period — would step up and do the same for a community or its CFL team. And besides, the new owner not only bleeds Bomber blue, but Bison brown and so the university will get a marvelous facility as well. (For those folks who live near the university, they will notice that the traffic will be a little busier 10 or 11 times per year.)

 

The new stadium will be fine — although after watching the Dallas Cowboys spend a billion dollars (there’s that B-word again) on their new building I sometimes wonder what we’ll really get for $140 million. Still, the old stadium is done. Let’s hope that by 2011 when the new building is finished, the upper decks in the old one haven’t fallen down on someone. 

 

The days of public bailouts, which include right now to a certain extent, should be over. This is a good deal for everyone involved, especially the folks who buy tickets to Bomber games. Just go to www.blueandgold.ca for all the details.

 

It’s just too bad that so many people in the media don’t get it. Because they don’t get it and can’t explain it, far too many members of the public — who didn’t bother to show up at Asper’s public forums — don’t really get it, either.

 

 

Asper says. “I haven’t got a clue,” when asked about Stadium future.

Manitoba Premier Gary Doer says a deal for a new football stadium in Winnipeg could be completed in January. Winnipeg Mayor Sam Katz has signed off on the project. And now Manitoba’s federal conservative lieutenant Vic Toews, says, “the discussions are moving forward positively.”

 

That’s all great news, but for the most part, it’s still news to Winnipeg businessman, David Asper, the man behind the deal. He says he “doesn’t have a clue,” what’s going to happen.

 

Almost two years ago, Asper presented a plan to build a brand new football stadium in his home town, take over proprietorship of the community-owned Winnipeg Blue Bombers and, in theory, rescue the financially fragile franchise.

 

Over a period of about 23 months, Asper’s original idea has morphed into a 35,000-40,000-seat state of the art football complex at the University of Manitoba. It will service both the U of M and the Winnipeg Football Club as well as Manitoba’s amateur athletic community. The training rooms will be available to the public, a bubble will be built inside the facility for winter practices and amateur groups will be invited to use the building at a nominal fee.

 

As well, Asper will build “a commercial hub” (OK, a mall) at the current site of the stadium in the middle of an already huge commercial district. All profits from the “mall” will be directed toward both the Blue Bombers and an amateur football component that Asper envisions as one day making Manitoba, “the Texas of the North.”

 

The cost will be somewhere around $135 million, of which Asper is asking the province and feds to kick in $35 million — $20 million from Manitoba and another $15 million from Ottawa.

 

It’s a sensible arrangement that assists the U of M, grassroots amateur sport, Olympic-level sport, the local football side and even, in a sense, the Canadian Football League – a popular national sports loop playing most of its games in aging, run-down stadiums.

 

However, on the day Mike Kelly, the 27th head coach in Blue Bombers’ history was re-introduced to the local media, Asper still wondered what was going to happen to his stadium dream. After all, for nearly two years, Asper has been negotiating the funding of the project with Toews. Now, with parliament on hiatus and, perhaps, a new Liberal/NDP/Bloc Troika about to take control of the country, Asper’s dream might be in for a financial wakeup call.

 

“It’s frustrating because we’ve come so far,” Asper said. “Mr. Toews publicly supported our project as did most other Manitoba Conservatives. We’re ready, but what’s going on in Ottawa could delay the project, I just don’t have a clue. You have to admit, the world has changed dramatically since we came up with the first proposal (way back in January of 2007).”

 

By the time Asper’s brilliant idea celebrates its second birthday next month, the man behind a new stadium in Winnipeg could be negotiating with a whole new crew. And that whole new crew will have very little representation from Western Canada. As a result, it might not feel obligated to talk about stadium funding with a group from PC-heavy Manitoba.

 

“I don’t really know what will happen either, but I suspect that at best, it will cause a delay,” said Ken Hildahl, the current president of the Winnipeg Football Club. “David has been negotiating with Vic (Toews) for nearly two years and my sense is that the negotiations have gone well. We certainly have a provincial commitment so maybe with an NDP provincial government, the new coalition in Ottawa won’t make any difference, but, really, who knows?”

 

The Bombers current stadium will be 55-years-old this summer and it not only looks old, it feels older. And yet, thanks to the upheaval in Ottawa, the old dump could still celebrate a few more birthdays.

 

The Pros and Cons of Building a New Football Stadium in Winnipeg

It appears as if Winnipeg businessman David Asper is closing in on his dream of building a new stadium for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers and with that new stadium, taking over the Football Club as it’s sole private owner.

 

Everything about Asper’s plan to put a new stadium at the University of Manitoba is brilliant and makes remarkable sense and yet there are still thousands of Winnipeggers who do not want to see a new stadium built.

 

When I run into those people — and believe me there are plenty of them — this is how I approach their arguments (to be fair, most of them are against everything, including clean water and sanitary toilets, but I digress). I will start with the cons — and how I argue those cons — and finish with a partial list of the pros… 

 

CONS

 

1. The expense: It’s easy for individuals and groups to argue that a public investment of $35 million to $80 million for a new football stadium is not a priority. These are often the same people who will argue that $1 billion per year for the CBC is a valid expenditure (In 2008, the CBC paid $48 million in public money to win rights to the Olympics and another $65 million per season for Hockey Night in Canada. That’s $113 million for broadcast rights that would quickly be paid by one of the private sports networks). Those people are just plain goofy. Until some taxpayer federation stands up with its nuts in the right place and says “The CBC is a waste of public funds,” ANY other argument against spending public money is moot.

 

2. The anti-sports people: Canada is not like the United States, where sports rule. In Canada, we have groups and individuals who actually lobby government claiming that the arts are worthy of public funding but sports are not. I call these people – many of them Canadian politicians – the people who were beaten up in high school Phys. Ed. You can’t argue with them. You can’t even bring health and fitness into the argument. They’re just against sport and they will never change.

 

3. Public money should be spent on reducing child poverty or health care: That was the mantra of the anti-arena factions during the Jets arena debate. Of course, when money wasn’t spent on the arena and the Jets left, the money wasn’t spent on reducing child poverty or health care, either. In fact, in a story in 2002 in the Winnipeg Free Press, child poverty in Manitoba has never been worse and health care was a mess of lineups, waiting lists and a lack of rural doctors and facilities. We didn’t spend the money on the arena, but we didn’t spend it on anything else. We just didn’t get any extra federal money at all.

 

4. Refurbish the current stadium: Fine idea. It’s been refurbished half a dozen times. The last time, for the 1999 Pan Am Games, made it more uncomfortable for patrons – the seats are too small for anyone over 6-feet tall and nearly impossible to sit in for anyone over 190 pounds. It’s been refurbished to the point that another one would be silly. This is always being proposed by architecture forms that are looking for work. The biggest problem is that it would leave the stadium on the same site and just about everyone now agrees that with parking and traffic problems as they are, it should be moved out of a commercial area.

 

5. A football stadium is only used 10 times per year: This one drives me crazy and you hear it constantly from the media in Winnipeg. That’s because the media in Winnipeg doesn’t waste any time doing research. In Winnipeg, the football stadium is currently used about 100 times a year, mostly by community and amateur groups. With the bubble Asper proposes to build, it will be used 365 days a year and could be used for more than 2,000 different reasons.

 

PROS

 

1. It’s time: The football stadium is almost 55 years old. I took part in  the walk-through with David and the CFL before the 2006 Grey Cup. The building is cracking. The upper decks will fall on the lower decks at some point, whether that’s next week or 10 years from now, it will happen. Do you want to be mayor or premier when it happens?

 

2. The Bombers: Say what you like, win or lose, there is nothing in Manitoba that is shown and promoted more often – or even on a regular basis — by our national media than the Winnipeg Blue Bombers. It is our No. 1 daily media export. It is the most important national entity we have in this province. Nothing, not the symphony, not MTC, not Miriam Toews, nothing, is more widely known or more emotionally regarded from coast-to-coast than the Winnipeg Blue Bombers and yet, the team plays in a dump that looks like a dump on national TV. In other words, we project Winnipeg as a “dump” to the rest of the nation.

 

3. Community building: No one will suggest that the construction of the ballpark and the MTS Centre was “bad” for Winnipeg. The ballpark didn’t suck up much public funding, but the MTS Centre certainly did and yet it’s the busiest meeting place in the community. It was Dr. Lloyd Axworthy who said back in the early 1990s, “We need a new arena in Winnipeg for many reasons, none less important than community building. The arena brings people together and that’s important for the mere building of a community.”

 

4. The cost: An $80 million commitment to a public-private business venture isn’t that much money, if indeed the government can recoup in taxes an amount that justifies the partnership. Will governments get their investment back? Probably. And consider this. Why does Winnipeg always argue against itself? The province of Ontario, with significant help from the federal government, has proposed a bid for the 2015 Pan Am Games. The budget is $1.77 billion (Winnipeg’s bid in 1999 was $130 million and there was NO facilities legacy) and would include new football stadiums in both Toronto and Hamilton. Manitobans don’t EVER argue against billions in spending on recreational faciilties in other parts of the country, but we sure do argue against anything that might be good for us. Why is that?

 

5. Job Creation: This one can’t be argued. Major public-private construction partnerships create hundreds (maybe thousands) of jobs. From skilled trades to the receptionist’s job after the building is finished, it is the one benefit that can’t be argued. The proof is both the airport project and the hydro building. The naysayers will say, “Well, build something else like a theatre or an art gallery or a hospital,” and the response should be, “Sure, let’s do that, too.” You can’t say there isn’t enough money to go around because we have enough money to fight a war in Afghanistan, to spend billions on an Olympic Games, to spend $1.77 billion on a Pan Am Games. Money is a renewable resource. You want more government money, build more casinos and get further into sports gambling. There are billions being spent by Canadians on sports gambling off-shore. Right now, with our archaic sports gambling rules, we’re shipping more money off-shore every month. Meanwhile, when the Canadian Taxpayers Federation yells, “End the funding of the CBC,” I’ll start listening to people who claim they’re fighting for more responsible public spending. 

 

6. Helping the Bombers become fiscally sound: Last year, the Bombers lost $216,000 with five sellout crowds. This year, with a rise in the salary cap to $4.1 million combined with a poor season on the field, the Bombers could lose as much as $2 million. Those losses, whether large or small, will continue for many years to come without (a) a new stadium and (b) the retail portion of Asper’s proposal that helps offset costs to the club. Currently, the city and province pump about $3.6 million each into the club, on average, per season and have done so since 1998. You may have read that Lyle Bauer et al got the Bombers out of debt. That statement is only true if you count $5.8 million in bad debts to Manitobans that were stayed, not written off, by the city and province. As long as government – YOU – continue to pay the debts, the Bombers keep going. That will remain the case, until such time as the Asper plan – or one like it – is implemented.