Tag Archives: hockey night in canada

Healy Makes it Up. Again. And we pay $1 billion a year for CBC?

In a country that is desperate to build new hockey rinks and football stadiums, we continue to waste $1 billion a year on the CBC.

Now, there was definitely a time when this nation needed the CBC, but that time has long passed. As a Junior Hockey broadcaster who sends plenty of time in the north, the existence of the CBC has become meaningless in this country. The people in remote parts of Canada now have satellite dishes and internet connections and more often than not, the CBC is ignored in these once forgotten towns. Frankly, the CBC is as meaningless to remote communities as it is to the country’s major centres (check the national ratings, other than Hockey Night in Canada, not many Canadians are watching the CBC).

That’s why the comments made by Hockey Night in Canada bingo caller Glenn Healy just pissed me off last week. Healy, who is certainly a mouthpiece for the NHLPA and therefore has some ties to the league’s union members, claimed that NHL players are now telling their owners that they won’t accept a trade to Atlanta because the Thrashers might — in the next decade, perhaps — move to Winnipeg.

What an incredibly absurd statement.

Healy seemed to suggest that players don’t want to go to Atlanta because there are rumours on top of rumours hinting that maybe the Thrashers are finished as a franchise and are headed to Winnipeg, oh, next week — even though they just gave GM Rick Dudley a contract extension.

Here’s Healy’s quote: “Guess what name is appearing on a lot of players’ no-move teams? Atlanta. Why? Because if the team goes to Winnipeg, it’s not a desirable place for them to play their winters.”

And Pittsburgh, Edmonton and Detroit are desirable? What a crock. Healy made it clear to CBC viewers that he’s already seen the players contracts and they are all heading into the GM’s office to re-negotiate right now, in the middle of the season. Even though many minor pro baseball players actually ask to sign in Winnipeg (see the story in the Spring Edition of ONE Magazine), hockey players are too dumb to understand that Winnipeg is a pretty good place to play and raise a family. He forgot that NHLers Dale Hawerchuk, Scott Arniel, Keith Tkachuk and Shane Hnidy all arrived in Winnipeg and married Winnipeg girls. It’s a nice town.

Healy is certainly entitled to his own opinion, but he’s not entitled to his own facts. As the franchise-saving deal in Phoenix continues to crater, are players now telling their GMs they’ll never go to Phoenix because maybe, sometime in the next 30 years, the Coyotes will move back to Winnipeg? In fact, there are strugglung franchises in Sunrise, Fla., on Long Island, in Denver, Dallas and Nashville. Are players saying they won’t go there, either? If these alleged players are worried about Winnipeg, they might want to tell their GMs they just won’t accept a trade anywhere.

It was a stupid comment by a stupid man, but what bothered me most was that not one person on the Hockey Night in Canada panel challenged the idiocy of the statement. Everyone let the stupidity pass and, in the process, looked stupid themselves. On a Canadian TV network paid for by Canadian taxpayers, nobody stood up for a city of 750,000 people that was named the best city to invest in in all of Canada in 2010.

The Federal Government needs to wean the CBC off its annual taxpayer gift of $1 billion. What happened last Saturday was bad for the country and taxpayers should no longer be forced to pay for such drivel.

Another Made Up Mainstream Media Rumour Forces Everyone into Denial.

Saturday night on Hockey Night in Canada, Al Strachan was at it again. Strachan told a breathless audience that “two Toronto businessmen are close to purchasing the Atlanta Thrashers so they can move them to Winnipeg.”

How many different ways can you say, “crock of crap?”

Strachan was once a big-time hockey writer with Sun Media. He had an inside line to agent Don Meehan and in order to keep that line free, he publicly promoted the demands of the NHL Players (read: Agents) Association. Far too much of Strachan’s scribbling wasn’t based in reality so it was not surprising when he cooked up this rumour.

Now to be fair, the sale of the Thrashers is not particularly far-fetched. The team is a complete disaster in Atlanta so why not sell it to somebody who can make the thing work. Canada is obviously the only place where big-time hockey can work and even though Canadian teams playing in the United States seem to be the scourge of American hockey marketers, it’s already been proven that six Canadian teams generate about 33 per cent of the NHL’s total revenue.  The NHL needs more Canadian-based teams, not fewer.

So, naturally, the Thrashers denied that the team was for sale and got rather testy when www.rivercitysportsblog.com asked if the team was being sold to “a couple of guys from Toronto,” who had plans to move it to Winnipeg.

“Completely false,” said Thrashers GM Don Waddell.

While it IS likely the Thrashers are for sale and eventually will be sold to new owners, who may or may not ask to re-locate the team, Atlanta is not the launching pad that will generate Winnipeg’s next NHL franchise.

The launching pad is still Phoenix. The Coyotes will probably lose upwards of $100 million this season. The Coyotes don’t play at home until Saturday night and et they’ve already started reducing ticket prices to $25 in the lower bowl. The NHL will soon take over ownership of this mess in the desert and you can bet they won’t be flushing money down that giant toilet for more than one year.

To their credit, the Thompson family from Osmington Inc. and Thompson Reuters, the people who own the majority of shares in True North Sports and Entertainment, have been working quietly and professionally to bring the NHL to Winnipeg. They will succeed.

But when you start believing the gibberish that is generated at Hockey Night in Canada, you will be stuck believing things that simply aren’t going to happen.

More Reasons for the Death of the Mainstream Newspaper: No news. No commitment to reading what used to be news.

TAMPA — So here we are in Tampa’s St. Pete Times Forum watching Alexander Ovechkin score his 50th goal of the season when all of a sudden he’s warming his hands over his red-hot stick.

Almost immediately, as one looked around the press box, you could assume someone was going to be pissed right off. Ovechkin’s little post-goal, Tony Award-winning celebration combined with the look on the face of Tampa Bay Lightning head coach Rick Tocchet clearly suggested that there would be words in the post-game scrum.

 

No one was disappointed.

 

“It’s hard for me to accept, just to see that happen in our building,” Tocchet said. “I grew up as a player in the days of the old Spectrum in Philly and if that happened in the first period at the Spectrum, it would have been a three-hour period.” 

 

Great, so why didn’t it happen at the Forum in downtown Tampa? Well, for one thing, the Lightning are done and most of them don’t care and for another, you can’t hurt Ovechkin.

 

And that’s what has made all this fuss about Don Cherry’s remarks on CBC a month ago, and I’m paraphrasing, that “Somebody is going to get Ovechkin.” It’s a complete crock.

 

That’s because Cherry, and all the knobs in the print media, forgot that Ovechkin has already been got.

 

Hey boys, ever wonder why Alex doesn’t have any teeth when he does post-game interviews? That’s because, on Dec. 30, 2006, Colton Orr of the New York Rangers cross-checked Ovechkin in the mouth and took out his front teeth. For his oh, so violent act, Orr was suspended five games. 

 

So why did Orr do it? Ironically, not because of anything Ovechkin did. He did it because he told the Caps Donald Brashear that if he goes after Brendan Shanahan again, “I’m going after Ovechkin.”

 

Well, sure enough, Brashear punched Shanahan after a whistle. So on Orr’s next shift, he jumped over the bench, cross-checked Ovechkin and rattled his chiclets. 

 

Ovechkin was stunned, but got up and continued playing. Orr was handed a minor penalty and two days later, the suspension. But everyone marveled at Ovechkin’s toughness.

 

The guy is not afraid and you can’t hurt him.

 

But still, the old guy who wears clown suits on TV, gets ripped by the national print media for suggesting someone’s going to go after Ovechkin. Sadly, no one in the print media remembered (or bothered to look up) the Orr incident. 

 

So not only was Cherry wrong, but the entire mainstream media was wrong for simply assuming ol’ Don knew what he was talking about. And, hey, we even helped ‘em get it right by talking about Colton Orr’s cross-check on radio stations in Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg. Sadly, the mainstream newspaper industry is hopeless.

 

In the old days, someone in the print media would have looked up “any incidents involving Alexander Ovechkin” before going off half-cocked. Now, the people who rip bloggers for having no editors, don’t even bother doing what they were taught in J-school.

 

The mainstream media is dying not just because newsprint prices are rising or labour costs are increasing, but because the content is weak.

 

Alexander Ovechkin is one of the greatest players in all of hockey. When he’s done, he’ll be remembered as one of the greatest of all time. But he shouldn’t have been showboating in Tampa. Like Teemu Selanne’s penchant for shooting down his glove with his stick after a big goal at Winnipeg Arena, Ovechkin’s little performance was a home town dance, not a road taunt. 

 

If Colton Orr was playing for the Lightning in Tampa — in last place or not — he’d have made Rick Tocchet happy.

 

Meanwhile, it seems that every time I read a newspaper, I just feel dumber for the effort.  

Don’t believe stories based on “un-named sources”

Now that just about everyone in the National Hockey League has denied that anyone at any level of the game has ever discussed, even informally, the prospect of having two NHL teams at the Air Canada Centre in Toronto, it might be time to remind ourselves that you can’t believe everything you read.

Especially if the premise of the story comes with “Un-named Sources.”

 

The cornerstone of the Globe and Mail story (and don’t worry, when we originally read the story on the news at 92-CITI-FM last week, as always, we went out of our way to credit the Globe for their fine reporting), Joe Aiello and I discussed the fact that we couldn’t believe that the NHL would really, truly consider putting another team in Toronto.

 

Both of us contended that if RIM’s Jim Balsillie — the Blackberry inventor who would very much like to buy a chunk of any NHL team and move it to Ontario — actually did realize his dream, his best bet would be to build an arena on the 401 near Kitchener and draw from a huge fan base in Kitchener, Waterloo, Guelph, Cambridge, Brantford, Brampton, Georgetown, London, Fergus, St. Thomas, St. Mary’s Stratford etc., etc. 

 

But a second team in Toronto? Who said that?

 

Evidently, nobody.

 

Commissioner Gary Bettman immediately denied the story, but hey, most Canadian hockey fans tend not to believe Bettman at the best of times. However, when everyone from MLSE’s Richard Peddie to the general managers of just about every team in the NHL denied EVER having even suggested or heard a suggestion that the league might put a second team — an expansion team no less — into Toronto’s ACC, it was the embarrassing end for a newspaper reporter’s best friend, ol’ Un-named Sources.

 

Ultimately, this story was a lot like most NHL trade rumours you hear (or Hockey Night in Canada‘s made-up yarn that Tampa owner Len Barrie went into the Lightning dressing room and started writing up plays on a chalkboard). Until the trade deadline rolls around and GMs actually talk publicly about potential deals, none of those rumours are true. They are all based on “un-named sources,” which means they were probably made up over copious barley sandwiches.

 

So here’s a tip, don’t believe any story based on “un-named sources.” Especially, when it comes to our favourite rumour (one that always seems to be full of Un-named Sources): The Return of the Jets.

We called another one: TSN’s collective brain WAS bigger than a walnut.

Some things you just know are going to happen. Between France’s 0-0 snoozer with Romania and the Netherlands’ 3-0 blistering of the undermanned Italians in the European Soccer Championship came the news that you will now hear the Hockey Night in Canada theme, Canada’s second national anthem, on all NHL games and Olympic hockey games televised on TSN from now on.

From TSN’s standpoint that’s not a surprise. Even if you had just a little, tiny, squirrel brain, you could have said to yourself, “If those morons at CBC actually do dump the theme, we’ll pay what we need to pay in order to get the rights.”

In fact, in our Friday blog entitled, “CBC to drop Canada’s “second national anthem” along with Bob Cole. Sad,” we wrote the following: “At first, I lamented CBC’s decision to dump the theme and then I thought, “Well if TSN has a collective brain bigger than a walnut, those folks will start sending cheques to the composer, Dolores Claman, and start using the theme themselves.” TSN’s broadcast crew is already better than CBC’s, they might just as well take the theme music — the best there is and, without argument, Canada’s second national anthem. 

Yesterday, the news story arrived…

TORONTO (CP) — CTV has acquired the rights to the song that’s been CBC’s “Hockey Night in Canada” theme for the past 40 years.

CTV and Copyright Music and Visuals, the company that controls use of the classic song composed by Dolores Claman, announced Monday afternoon that CTV acquired all rights to the song in perpetuity.

The network says it will use the song on NHL broadcasts on TSN, RDS and during the broadcaster’s coverage of the 2010 Olympics in Vancouver.

CTV says it made an agreement in principle Friday with Copyright Music and Visuals after CBC announced a contest to find a new theme song.

The contest announcement followed months of negotiations that failed to result in a new licensing agreement between CBC and the agent. 

CBC lost the rights to the tune because it made a giant error in judgment that will now haunt it forever. 

The press release read as follows:

“The song has a long and storied history in Canadian sports and has become ingrained in the hearts and minds of hockey fans across the country. It is an iconic tune, embraced by Canadians everywhere, and we felt it was imperative to save it. We know we will be in hockey forever, so there’s no doubt this acquisition will create value for us,” said Rick Brace, President, Revenue, Business Planning and Sports, CTV Inc. “It’s an honour and a privilege to own such a cherished piece of Canadiana.

 

“I am very moved by how so many Canadians have taken the hockey theme to heart. We are so pleased the song has found a new home,” said Claman. “Throughout our negotiations, CTV displayed a tremendous amount of respect for my family and the song. ‘The Hockey Theme’ means so much to Canadians, and we know it’s in good hands with CTV.”

 

Poor old CBC. They actually hired sports lawyer Gord Kirke on Monday morning to negotiate a new deal. By 3 p.m. on Monday, they’d lost the song forever.

 

Obviously, the people who run the CBC do not have brains as big as walnuts. Or squirrels. 

 

However, we must ask: “…and that’s the kind of leadership that our $975 million a year worth of tax money is buying?” 

 

Sorry. Now, I really have to wonder who has the tiny, little brain.

CBC to drop Canada’s “second national anthem” along with Bob Cole. Sad.

It seems that nobody likes old stuff anymore and I can certainly understand that, especially when it comes to my kids. They’re 24 and 26 and they still roll their eyes when I talk about the good ol’ days of the 1960s when we got our hockey from Ward Cornell, Brian McFarlane, Danny Gallivan, Keith Dancey and the father and son Hewitts.

 

So yeah, I have to admit, I’m an old school kind of guy.

 

I love two things about CBC’s hockey coverage and only two things: The theme music and Bob Cole. Sadly, the rest of it just isn’t as good as it used to be and, frankly, these days I’ll take TSN’s or NBC’s hockey coverage over CBC every single time.

 

Five years ago, I never would have said that. Never would have thought it.

 

But now, the CBC’s claim to the top is under siege — from within as well as from without.

 

While I’d still rather listen to Bob Cole than Mike Emrick (and I don’t mind Mike Emrick), Greg Millen makes me yell at the television (so does TSN’s Glenn Healy so it must be a goalie thing). He talks just to talk. I’m sure he knows he’s not saying anything of any value, but I guess he figures he gets paid to talk so he’s going to talk. He’s the mute button waiting to be clicked. 

 

CBC hasn’t admitted it publicly yet, but all indications are, they’re about to limit Cole’s participation in the telecasts. They’re cutting the wrong guy. 

 

Then there is Don Cherry and Ron MacLean. What’s with that? MacLean is still an outstanding broadcaster, but his sidekick has come unhinged. The Gary-Roberts-is-all-that thing during the playoffs just made you want to call the Canadian Board of Television Relevance (if there is a CRTC out there as it’s rumoured there is, there might as well be a CBTR). The guy played nine minutes a game and hit nothing but the boards. He doesn’t score anymore, can’t handle the puck and was virtually invisible if you watched the NBC telecasts (maybe NBC telecasts a different game from a parallel universe???). But to Cherry and the CBC, Roberts was Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin and Jordan Staal all rolled into one. 

 

Meanwhile, ol’ Don ignored Crosby and most of the Red Wings for reasons known only to him. It’s kind of sad to watch a once-intriguing ex-hockey-coach-turned-broadcaster collapse into his own personal grievances. And the “I-was-only-doing-it-to-help-the-kid,” take on his own criticisms of Crosby sounded a tad disingenuous.

 

Remember when Cherry hit MacLean with an elbow pad a couple of years ago. MacLean needs to return the favour.  

 

Perhaps my kids are right. Perhaps things just get old and Hockey Night in Canada is old. Maybe, what they’re doing here is just trying to get younger. 

 

And if you need more proof, consider this little nugget: The CBC has decided that it’s probably going to drop it’s Hockey Night in Canada theme music because it, evidently, doesn’t like paying a $500 per game fee to the still-living composer in order to claim the rights. This is the same network that pays Cherry and MacLean about a million dollars a year between them to make us crave NBC and TSN, but don’t like the idea of giving $30,000 a year to the woman who created their identity. But hey, it’s taxpayers money, CBC obviously has a mandate to do what it pleases.

 

At first, I lamented CBC’s decision to dump the theme and then I thought, “Well if TSN has a collective brain bigger than a walnut, those folks will start sending cheques to the composer, Dolores Claman, and start using the theme themselves.” TSN’s broadcast crew is already better than CBC’s, they might just as well take the theme music — the best there is and, without argument, Canada’s second national anthem. 

 

Listen, I still love Coley and I don’t hit the mute button when Scott Oake comes on, but the rest of Hockey Night in Canada (don’t get me started on the Toronto Hot Stove) is a waste of good broadcast time. 

 

TSN has long been the superior telecast and now, with an expanded schedule of game coverage, Rogers SportsNet’s pretty extensive coverage of the two Alberta teams and Shaw’s NHL Centre Ice, there is a good chance we all just might forget CBC’s Hockey Night in Canada ever existed.