Tag Archives: Quebec City

Take cover. We are surrounded by idiots. Senator’s Bill would jail or fine people for playing American football in Canada.

Here is the quality of representation with which the Liberals stocked the Senate…

 

A former Mayor of Vancouver who now gets a free lunch on the backs of Canadian taxpayers wants any Canadian who plays a game of American football on his private property to go to jail for up to two years.

 

Larry Campbell should be jailed for being an idiot.

 

According to Bill S-238, a bill that received its first reading on Tuesday, NFL teams would be barred from playing regular season games in Canada. If found guilty of this egregious offence, perps could be jailed for up to two years and fined.

 

Our country is going to hell in a handcart driven by people we pay to be leaders. We’re screwed.

 

The bill, first exposed in Friday’s National Post by Sean FitzGerald, was introduced to “prevent the expansion of the Canadian Football League outside of Canada.”

 

According to the Post, Senator Larry Campbell spent weeks drafting the bill, amid speculation the NFL might be (and it’s a gigantic MIGHT be) moving closer to making Toronto the home of the Buffalo Bills. The Bills have agreed to play eight games at Rogers Centre over the next five years. That’s all. Five regular season games. The Bills are NOT moving to Canada, but like the Dave Matthews Band, Mariah Carey or Disney on Ice, the NFL is showing off its product in a country that watches and wagers on the game with gusto.

 

Campbell’s bill demands that “no person owning or operating a football team within a foreign league shall require or permit that team to play football in Canada.” It goes on to declare “no person shall play football within Canada as a player on a football team within a foreign league.” That also includes the Arena Football League which would be a great addition to our minor pro sports milieu in Winnipeg, but ol’ Larry obviously doesn’t give a rat’s ass about cities like Winnipeg. 

 

“The CFL is a Canadian institution,” Mr. Campbell said in a recent interview with the Post. “We like to protect all of our other cultural icons, but there doesn’t seem to be the same vigour with the CFL. I don’t think that’s true, and I’m going to prove that.

 

“There’s always this idea that, if it’s your own money you’re spending, you can do whatever you want. Sorry. That doesn’t happen in my world. You should be looking out for the good of the country and the good of your community.”

 

I guess I’m not a very good Canadian, Larry, because, like the vast majority of my friends and colleagues, I’d love to see the NFL come to Canada. As well as the Arena League, for that matter. NFL football is the most interesting game in the most brilliantly operated sports league in North America and Canada should be proud that the NFL would even consider someday placing a franchise here (even if that franchise is located in Toronto which, in professional sports terms, REALLY isn’t a Canadian city anyway). 

 

If placing an NFL franchise in Toronto, does indeed kill the Canadian Football League, then it never should have existed in the first place. If the league is that weak, it deserves to die. If having competition in Toronto kills the rest of the CFL, then it really wasn’t very strong in the first place, was it?

 

Frankly, it would be a much better idea if Campbell sponsored a bill that would pay for new CFL stadiums in Ottawa, Halifax, Quebec City, Winnipeg, Regina, Hamilton, Toronto and Montreal. Banning the NFL would only create resentment. On the other hand, improving the lot of the CFL, would create excitement.

 

But Larry, like almost all politicians, is too fundamentally stupid to understand that.

 

This bill requires approval from both the Senate and the House of Commons. Hopefully, someone with an actual brain will stop this insanity before it becomes law.

 

Jail terms for playing football? Throw this in with those kangaroo courts known as Human Rights Tribunals and it becomes painfully obvious that the people who run our nation are sick. 

 

 

Report: Canadian NHL Teams create 31 per cent of league’s ticket revenue.

A secret NHL report made public by Rick Westhead at the Toronto Star show that 31 per cent of the National Hockey League’s $1.1 billion (U.S.) in league ticket revenue, has come from the six teams based in Canada. 

According to the report that has not been made public by the NHL (as of Friday morning, May 30), “the league has seen its ticket revenue rise almost 10 per cent, but 11 of the 24 U.S.-based clubs were either revenue-flat or lost ticket income.”

Not surprisingly, the Toronto Maple Leafs finished first on the list at $1.9 million in ticket revenue per game. The Montreal Canadiens were second. Based on 41 home games, the Leafs collected $77.9 million in ticket revenue last year and that doesn’t count the revenue from pre-season games. 

Now, to be fair, Westhead suggested the increase in the value of the Canadian dollar may be responsible for as much as half of the league’s revenue gains since the NHL went through the lockout of 2004-05, but that doesn’t explain why six little Canadian-based teams create more than 30 per cent of the revenue.

What that suggests is that Gary Bettman’s foray into South Florida, Tampa, Nashville, Atlanta and Phoenix (not to mention the existing messes in Chicago, Long Island and Washington) has been an unmitigated financial disaster.

“This really makes the case for another team in Canada, whether it’s Hamilton, Winnipeg or Quebec City,” former Vancouver Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths told Westhead.

The most interesting item in the league’s report concerns the embarrassing Phoenix Coyotes. The Coyotes, who have been a financial and, yes, popular disaster in the U.S. desert since they moved from Winnipeg in 1996, were last in ticket revenue at $450,000. That’s a disgrace to the sport and suggests that commissioner Gary Bettman’s decision to allow the Jets to move to the American desert was a massive error in judgment. In the Jets final lame-duck year in 1996, the team earned about $330,000 per game in ticket revenues. That was the lowest in the final five years of the team’s existence. Twelve years later, Phoenix is only $120,000 a game higher. My good gawd…

The Coyotes are now, officially, losing more than $30 million a season (according to the Arizona Republic) and have lost as much as $600 million since leaving Winnipeg. 

According to the report, obtained by rivercitysportsblog.com on Friday morning, in 2007-08, eight U.S. teams – the Coyotes, the Atlanta Thrashers, the Florida Panthers, the New York Islanders, the Chicago Blackhawks, the Washington Capitals, the Nashville Predators and the St. Louis Blues – generated less than half the amount of ticket revenue of the Edmonton Oilers and Ottawa Senators. At $1.2 million in ticket revenue per game, the Oilers and Senators earned the least amount of ticket money among the six Canadian franchises.

This report obviously opens up the debate about bringing an NHL team back to Winnipeg.

Granted, Winnipeg has a population of only 700,000. Granted, Winnipeg lags behind other cities in weekly earnings. Granted, our corporate financial marketing base is very small. And granted, our downtown arena is tiny, with no parking revenue, many uncomfortable seats and too few luxury suites. 

However, there is little question that after 12 years, fans are dying to have the NHL return. The mere fact that my book, “The Winnipeg Jets: A Celebration of Professional Hockey in Winnipeg,” sold out 7,000 copies in Manitoba alone, is a clear indication that the Jets mattered, still do and that their return would still draw large crowds. Hey, if I were Bettman, I’d put a team in Central Ontario tomorrow. Then I’d look at Winnipeg and Quebec City.

It has been suggested that the money is already in place in order for Winnipeg to acquire a franchise. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but I do know this: No matter what happens in terms of the future of the NHL, Winnipeg will ALWAYS be a better market for big-time hockey than the southern United States.

Period. End of discussion.