Tag Archives: Toronto Star

Fitzgerald Ready: “It’s just like playing at Martin Luther King Park in Minneapolis.”

NFL Super Bowl Report No. 4, Tuesday Jan. 26, 2009

TAMPA — It was Media Day today, the annual Tuesday of Super Bowl week where allegedly serious journalists get all tangled up with the circus freaks from MTV and Nickleodeon. 

 

Fact is, Tuesday of Super Bowl Week is usually a circus and it’s usually great fun.

 

At least, in most other years, it’s been a circus. Today, however, it was eerily subdued. There was one freak from Telemundo who had a five-o’clock shadow and yet dressed like a blonde hooker — wig, cocktail dress, too much makeup, the whole Hallowe’en costume. OK, so he was more like a fat, old hooker and it was truly disgusting, but he was so quiet and he was around so little that he was hardly noticeable. 

 

This year, at the Recession Bowl, most of the talk among the media members has had more to do with when their respective newspapers would fold, not whether Larry Fitzgerald would catch nine more passes for 150 more yards and three more touchdowns on Sunday.

 

In fact, sitting on the bus in front of a couple of New York writers, it sounded as if the end was near for the heavily-indebted New York Times.

 

“I just don’t understand the new business model,” said one 50-ish writer. “You take the product that you used to charge people for, put it on the web and give it away. The people who run this business have absolutely no clue how a business works and now they sit around and wonder what happened.

 

“The Tucson Citizen, the Rocky Mountain News, the Seattle P-I, and more are threatening to go. These papers still make money, but the owners have so much debt service, they can’t make it work.”

 

“It’s just so silly,” said the other 45-ish journo. “The web is a voracious beast. You just feed it and feed it and it’s still hungry. Everyday, we feed it more and more copy and yet it can’t make any money, but we now work harder on the web than we do on the paper. Meanwhile, the core business can’t keep up with its debt financing.

 

“It’s true, editors and publishers are editors and publishers. The concept of business completely eludes them.” 

 

So on Tuesday at Media Day at Super Bowl XLIII, there were plenty of so-called serious journalists, but very few women dressed up like strippers, girls dressed up like trees or vegetables and men dressed up like hookers. There were very few questions like this: “If you were a pizza, what kind of pizza would you be?”

 

“The freaks aren’t here, because very few of us are here,” said Dave Perkins of the Toronto Star. “Every year, there are fewer and fewer of us. They say the business is changing. It’s changing faster than we think.”

 

So on a very interesting Media Day, here are a few interesting responses…

 

1) A little more than a month ago, Mitch Berger was in B.C. kicking a football all by himself. This week, he’s preparing for Super Bowl XLIII. He can’t believe it.

 

“I really thought I’d go when I was in Minnesota in 1998,” Berger said, surrounded by a handful of Canadian media types.

 

“That was a great season. We were 15-1 and Randy Moss was rookie of the year,” Berger said. “I thought that was my one and only chance. Then we got another chance in 2001, but we went into New York and got spanked by the Giants in the NFC Championship.

 

“And that was it. I thought I was done. I was home in B.C., kicking by myself, and nobody called. Not even a CFL team called. I think Winnipeg still has my rights and I thought they might call, they had kicking problems all year, but they didn’t call, so I thought I might have to wait until training camp next year.

 

“Then my agent got a call from the Steelers and now here I am. I’m enjoying Super Bowl Week, my family gets in tomorrow, it’s going to be a great, great time.”

 

Berger owns four restaurants and a bar in Vancouver and Victoria and he’ll never be broke. But to get one more shot at the Super Bowl is just about as good as it gets.

 

2) Larry Fitzgerald Jr. said yesterday that his dad, sportswriter Larry Sr., will be all over him this week. 

 

“But in a good way.”

 

“He’ll tell me to get plenty of rest, to eat right, to stay out of trouble,” said the Cards gifted wideout, a young man on the verge of setting every playoff receiving record in NFL history.  

 

“Having my dad around is great. He’s done so much for me because he allowed me to be a big part of his life. I got to hang around with some of the greatest athletes in history. He’s the reason I’m able to do what I love to do today. When you’re a youth and you see what you want you want to do for the rest of your life and you eventually get to do it, then that’s really living the dream.

 

“Right now, I’m living the dream.”

 

Fitzgerald said that with his dad staying with him in the team hotel, he’s able to take the distractions out of his game.

 

“I look at this game this way: It’s the same game I’ve been playing since I was seven years old at Martin Luther King Park in Minneapolis. Sure it’s the Super Bowl, sure it’s the biggest stage on earth. But it’s the same game I’ve always played. I just need to run my routes, catch the ball and run with it. That’s all it is. It’s just football.”

 

3) Arizona coach Ken Whisenhunt, was asked how he turned around a team that played mediocre football down the stretch and finished the regular season at 9-7.

 

Let’s be honest here: The Cards were dreadful in December, but have been unbeatable in January.

 

In fact, as the question was being asked, former Detroit Lions head coach Steve Mariucci — a guy who had a lot of trouble winning football games — wondered aloud whether Whisenhunt had changed the system or delivered a different message.

 

“None of the above,” Whisenhunt said with a smile. “There was nothing tangible that happened. We just got hot at the right time. Nobody gave us a chance in the playoffs so it’s been the us-against-the-world mentality and the guys have bought into it. We’ve done nothing more than get hot at the right time.”

 

Funny, it’s actually starting to feel a little cooler here in Tampa. 

 

Oh, by the way, last night before the Montreal-Tampa NHL game, the duo of Les Sabler (on guitar) and Marshall Gillon (vocals) provided both the Canadian and U.S. national anthems.

 

I have never heard O Canada or the Star Spangled Banner performed better. Outstanding doesn’t even begin to describe how spectacular it was. 

 

Another by the way, no matter what the P.A. announcer told the crowd, the attendance at last night’s game in Tampa, was a lie.

 

The St. Pete Times Forum was not half full for the Habs and Bolts.

Talking points: Prevent defence. It doesn’t work in football and it sure doesn’t work in hockey.

After thinking about Pittsburgh’s 4-3 triple-overtime victory over Detroit in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup, here are five talking points to discuss amongst yourselves…

 

1. Assuming that the NHL really wanted a Game 6 on NBC this week, was there some kind of conspiracy to change the way the game was officiated in overtime so that phantom goaltender interference penalties (and not dives) would be called just to give the Penguins a couple of OT power-plays? My answer is no, simply because I have never been given any evidence that the NHL is smart enough to concoct a conspiracy (see the report on ticket revenue in the Toronto Star).

 

2. Marc-Andre Fleury doesn’t get enough credit. On Monday night, the shots were 58-32 in favour of Detroit. The Red Wings dominated the game. Still, Pittsburgh won. On 92-CITI-FM on Monday morning, Joe and I asked fans to suggest a Conn Smythe Trophy winner. The overwhelming number of respondents chose Detroit goalie Chris Osgood. That suggests to me that most people who phone radio stations haven’t been watching the Stanley Cup final.

 

3. Sidney Crosby is as good as the hype.

 

4. If you get a four-minute power-play in overtime, you should win the game. But the game never should have reached overtime.

 

5. I have a theory. It goes like this: I’d make a horrible football owner because I’d write into my coach’s contract that the moment he went into “prevent defence,” I could fire him on the spot and replace him with myself. Crazy? I don’t think so. That’s because, I believe that after you’ve beaten the crap out of a team for 59 minutes, why fall back into a defensive shell, in fear of what they might do to you? Sorry, coach, but you keep kicking the crap out of them until they curl up into the fetal position and yell “Momma!!!” Detroit gave us the hockey equivalent of prevent defence on Monday and as a result the Wings blew a 3-2 lead in the dying seconds and lost in overtime (and might have lost the Cup, as a result). Playing any sport scared is an invitation to the other team to come and beat the bee-jeezus out of you. No matter what happened in overtime on Monday night, Detroit lost Game 5 in the final 10 minutes of regulation. 

Report: Canadian NHL Teams create 31 per cent of league’s ticket revenue.

A secret NHL report made public by Rick Westhead at the Toronto Star show that 31 per cent of the National Hockey League’s $1.1 billion (U.S.) in league ticket revenue, has come from the six teams based in Canada. 

According to the report that has not been made public by the NHL (as of Friday morning, May 30), “the league has seen its ticket revenue rise almost 10 per cent, but 11 of the 24 U.S.-based clubs were either revenue-flat or lost ticket income.”

Not surprisingly, the Toronto Maple Leafs finished first on the list at $1.9 million in ticket revenue per game. The Montreal Canadiens were second. Based on 41 home games, the Leafs collected $77.9 million in ticket revenue last year and that doesn’t count the revenue from pre-season games. 

Now, to be fair, Westhead suggested the increase in the value of the Canadian dollar may be responsible for as much as half of the league’s revenue gains since the NHL went through the lockout of 2004-05, but that doesn’t explain why six little Canadian-based teams create more than 30 per cent of the revenue.

What that suggests is that Gary Bettman’s foray into South Florida, Tampa, Nashville, Atlanta and Phoenix (not to mention the existing messes in Chicago, Long Island and Washington) has been an unmitigated financial disaster.

“This really makes the case for another team in Canada, whether it’s Hamilton, Winnipeg or Quebec City,” former Vancouver Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths told Westhead.

The most interesting item in the league’s report concerns the embarrassing Phoenix Coyotes. The Coyotes, who have been a financial and, yes, popular disaster in the U.S. desert since they moved from Winnipeg in 1996, were last in ticket revenue at $450,000. That’s a disgrace to the sport and suggests that commissioner Gary Bettman’s decision to allow the Jets to move to the American desert was a massive error in judgment. In the Jets final lame-duck year in 1996, the team earned about $330,000 per game in ticket revenues. That was the lowest in the final five years of the team’s existence. Twelve years later, Phoenix is only $120,000 a game higher. My good gawd…

The Coyotes are now, officially, losing more than $30 million a season (according to the Arizona Republic) and have lost as much as $600 million since leaving Winnipeg. 

According to the report, obtained by rivercitysportsblog.com on Friday morning, in 2007-08, eight U.S. teams – the Coyotes, the Atlanta Thrashers, the Florida Panthers, the New York Islanders, the Chicago Blackhawks, the Washington Capitals, the Nashville Predators and the St. Louis Blues – generated less than half the amount of ticket revenue of the Edmonton Oilers and Ottawa Senators. At $1.2 million in ticket revenue per game, the Oilers and Senators earned the least amount of ticket money among the six Canadian franchises.

This report obviously opens up the debate about bringing an NHL team back to Winnipeg.

Granted, Winnipeg has a population of only 700,000. Granted, Winnipeg lags behind other cities in weekly earnings. Granted, our corporate financial marketing base is very small. And granted, our downtown arena is tiny, with no parking revenue, many uncomfortable seats and too few luxury suites. 

However, there is little question that after 12 years, fans are dying to have the NHL return. The mere fact that my book, “The Winnipeg Jets: A Celebration of Professional Hockey in Winnipeg,” sold out 7,000 copies in Manitoba alone, is a clear indication that the Jets mattered, still do and that their return would still draw large crowds. Hey, if I were Bettman, I’d put a team in Central Ontario tomorrow. Then I’d look at Winnipeg and Quebec City.

It has been suggested that the money is already in place in order for Winnipeg to acquire a franchise. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but I do know this: No matter what happens in terms of the future of the NHL, Winnipeg will ALWAYS be a better market for big-time hockey than the southern United States.

Period. End of discussion.